The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern QuestionGreene, Frederick Davis
History
The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern Question
Greene, Frederick Davis
Armenian massacres, 1894-1896; Armenian question
Xenophon’s account of the retreat of the ten thousand through this
mountainous region, in midwinter, and constantly harassed by enemies, is
valuable, not only as a tribute to the splendid discipline and spirit of
the Greeks, but for the light which it throws upon the ancient Armenians
and Kurds, whose houses, domestic habits, and employments are the same
in many respects even at the present day.[65]
Armenia was included in the conquests of Alexander, and afterwards
submitted to the Seleucidæ of Syria. In 190 B. C., when Antiochus the
Great was defeated by Scipio, Armenia revolted under Artaxias, who gave
refuge to the exiled Hannibal. About 150 B. C., the great Parthian king,
Mithridates I., established his brother Valarsaces in Armenia. The most
celebrated king of this branch of the Arsacid family was Tigranes II.,
who, while aiding Mithridates of Pontus, was defeated by Pompey. After
this, Tacitus says that the Armenians were almost always at war; with
the Romans through hatred, and with the Parthians through jealousy.[66]
Princes of this line continued to rule, however, until the Arsacidæ were
driven from the Persian throne by the Sassanid Ardashir. Though
frequently conquered by the kings of that dynasty, Armenia was enabled
as often to re-assert her freedom by the help of Roman arms.
When Tiridates embraced Christianity, 276 A. D., the struggle became
embittered by the introduction of a religious element, for the Persians
were bigoted Zoroastrians. This condition reached a climax when the
country was divided between the Romans and Persians, under Theodosius
the Great, 390 A. D.
[Illustration:
AN ARMENIAN TOMBSTONE OF A.D. 934.
Evidence of a high state of art.
]
After the fall of the Sassanidæ, in the seventh century, Armenia was
divided between the Greek Empire and the Saracens; but from 859 to 1045
it was again ruled by a native dynasty of vigorous princes, the
Pagratidæ. This was brought to a close by the suspicious and
short-sighted policy of the Byzantine emperors, one of whom, Constantine
IX., at last overthrew the Armenian kingdom, thereby laying open the
whole eastern frontier to the invasion of the Seljouk Turks, who shortly
before had begun their attacks, and who might have been successfully
resisted by these hardy mountaineers. The result was fatal, both to
Armenia, which was overrun, and to the Greek Empire; for by the battle
of Manzikert, 1071 A. D., when Romanus IV. was defeated and made
prisoner by Alp Arslan, the whole of Asia Minor was left at the mercy of
the Seljouks.[67]
Rupen, a relative of the last Pagratid sovereign, escaped into Cilicia,
and established the Rupenian dynasty, which was not extinguished until
the death of Leon VI., 1393, an exile in Paris, and the last of the
Armenian kings. The Rupenians had entered into alliance with the
Crusaders. They welcomed the Mongolian hordes under Genghis Khan, early
in the thirteenth century, and suffered the vengeance of the Mamelukes,
1375.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account