The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern QuestionGreene, Frederick Davis
History
The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern Question
Greene, Frederick Davis
Armenian massacres, 1894-1896; Armenian question
Going to the village of Auzont, Meza Bey pointed out four
Kurds of another tribe as the guilty men, took them into custody and
carried them for identification to Messrs. Knapp and Reynolds, who said
they were not the assailants.
During the night, in Aozou, a bundle was thrown through a window into a
room occupied by the police, which on examination proved to contain a
portion of the stolen goods. With this the governor-general rested from
his efforts and dispatched to his highness the minister of foreign
affairs, that the stolen goods were recovered and returned, and the
felons captured and punished. This report, the legation took the liberty
of informing his highness, was not true, also that the chief of the
assassins, Moussa Bey, was still at large; and to emphasize its
statement, the legation further said to his highness, that the details
it communicated were current through all the region of Bitlis, having
been first given out by Moussa himself. The legation then, in the same
note, exposed the maladministration of the governor-general in language
plain as respect for his highness, the minister, and for the Sublime
Porte would permit, and suggested as the only means of accomplishing
anything like redress that a brave impartial officer be sent to Bitlis
to investigate the conduct of the governor and take the affair in his
own hands. “Such a step,” it was added, “might serve to save the lives
of many Christians,” and it was further represented that “could the
assassins be brought to just sentence it would unquestionably lessen the
demand for indemnity which otherwise it would be the duty of the
legation to present against the Imperial Government in this connection.”
On November 7, 1883, the legation of the United States, by a third note,
No. 184, communicated to his highness, the minister of foreign affairs,
that the governor-general of Bitlis had confronted four persons with Mr.
Knapp for identification, and that that gentleman had recognized Moussa
Bey as one of those who had robbed and wounded him. The legation of the
United States then expressed a hope that the minister of foreign affairs
would give proper orders for bringing Moussa Bey and his companions in
crime before the tribunals for trial.
Still later, on November 12, 1883, the legation of the United States
addressed a fourth note, No. 185, to his highness, the minister of
foreign affairs, detailing again the circumstances of the attempted
murder of Messrs. Knapp and Reynolds, and representing the
untrustworthiness of the governor-general by charging that Moussa Bey
had already obtained from him assurances of immunity in the event of a
trial and conviction.
His highness, the minister, was then requested that, if it was decided
to maintain the governor-general at his post, orders be given for the
transfer of the criminals to Constantinople for trial.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account