The army behind the armyPowell, E. Alexander (Edward Alexander)
History
The army behind the army
Powell, E. Alexander (Edward Alexander)
United States. Army; World War, 1914-1918 -- United States
At first the better grades of wool appeared to be adequate to meet the
demands of the army, but later changes were made in the specifications
for various cloths—uniform cloth being increased from 16 to 20 ounces,
overcoating from 30 to 32 ounces, shirting flannel from 8½ to 9½ ounces,
and blankets from 3 to 4 pounds—which made it necessary to utilize
grades of wool which previously had been used only in coarse materials,
such as carpet. In order to obtain the necessary weight and warmth, the
lower grades of wool were blended with the higher grades, though this
frequently entailed a sacrifice of fineness of texture and appearance.
This explains why many of the uniforms worn by our returning soldiers
looked rough and uneven in color. But the necessary cloth was provided
and it was warm and it wore well. The trouble was that it was not
provided soon enough. During the autumn of 1917 and the succeeding winter
thousands of our soldiers, both in France and in the camps at home,
did not have sufficient clothing to keep them dry or warm. Hundreds of
American soldiers went into action wearing British uniforms—even to the
buttons bearing the royal cipher and crown!
The Quartermaster Corps introduced endless economies in order to save
wool. More economical patterns were made for uniforms. Originally 1.45
yards of cloth were required to make a pair of wool breeches. A cheaper
cutting pattern reduced this figure to 1.222 yards, thus saving nearly
a quarter of a yard of cloth on every pair. Since the purchases of wool
breeches amounted to 10,300,000 pairs, this single economy resulted in a
saving of over 2,300,000 yards of cloth on breeches alone. It was also
found that cotton linings could be substituted for the wool facings of
coats and overcoats without sacrificing either serviceability or warmth.
Another important cloth economy came when the designers of the Clothing
and Equipage Division eliminated the right-hand pocket of the “O. D.”
shirt on the ground that this pocket was not used enough to justify the
additional expense.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account