The army behind the armyPowell, E. Alexander (Edward Alexander)
History
The army behind the army
Powell, E. Alexander (Edward Alexander)
United States. Army; World War, 1914-1918 -- United States
The same was true, though in lesser
measure, of the great French, Italian, and Austrian ordnance concerns.
We in the United States, however, had nothing of the sort. The Bethlehem
Steel Company manufactured a limited amount of artillery, it is true, and
the Colt, Winchester, Savage, and Remington corporations manufactured
small arms, though mainly for sporting purposes, but they made them
without any hope of government encouragement or co-operation, and they
marketed them in foreign countries without any save the most casual
assistance from our diplomatic and consular officials. In certain cases,
indeed, the government actively discouraged American arms manufacturers
from disposing of their wares to foreign belligerents.
By the assurance of steady employment and lucrative remuneration the
great European ordnance manufacturers attracted to their employ men of
exceptional technical ability, thus forming a large and highly trained
personnel with long experience in manufacturing the tools of war. The
traditional policy of the United States, on the contrary, was to maintain
in government employ a small, a very small, group of technically trained
officers who, according to our careless American theory, would be able
to design and produce enough ordnance to meet the needs of our army in
the remote and unlikely contingency that we should ever become involved
in war. How ridiculously inadequate was this personnel will be realized
when I say that there were but ninety-seven officers in the Ordnance
Department at the outbreak of the war. How enormous were the requirements
of the suddenly embattled nation is strikingly emphasized by the fact
that 11,000 Ordnance officers were required for our first 5,000,000
men. All other branches of the service underwent similar expansion to a
greater or less extent, it is true, but whereas Signal Corps officers
could be recruited from the telegraph and telephone companies, Motor
Transport officers from the automobile industry, Railway Transport
officers from the great railway systems, Medical officers from the ranks
of the country’s surgeons and physicians, Engineer officers from the
various branches of the engineering profession, Quartermaster officers
from the packing and produce concerns, the clothing manufacturers,
and the building trades, paymasters from the banks and financial
institutions, judge-advocates from the members of the bar, there was no
field of American endeavor to which the War Department could turn for
officers trained in the highly technical and specialized profession of
ordnance design and manufacture. How could there be? There had never
been any demand for tanks, for trench-mortars, for airplane drop-bombs.
Ergo, there was no one in this country who possessed other than a
vague and theoretical knowledge of how to design or manufacture them.
Therefore, we had to set about training men to do these things. And
we could not train these men in a week or a month. Ordnance designing,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account