The army behind the armyPowell, E. Alexander (Edward Alexander)
History
The army behind the army
Powell, E. Alexander (Edward Alexander)
United States. Army; World War, 1914-1918 -- United States
“The representatives of Great Britain and France state that their
production of artillery, field, medium, and heavy, is now established
on so large a scale that they are able to equip complete all American
divisions as they arrive in France during the year 1918 with the best
make of British and French guns and howitzers. With a view, therefore,
to expediting and facilitating the equipment of the American armies in
France, and, second, securing the maximum ultimate development of the
munitions supply with the minimum strain upon available tonnage, the
representatives of Great Britain and France propose that the field,
medium, and heavy artillery be supplied during 1918, and as long as may
be convenient, from British and French gun factories.”
[Illustration: A SCENE IN AN AMERICAN ARSENAL.
The Ordnance Department effected the most complete mobilization of
science and industry the world has ever seen.]
[Illustration: FILLING A POWDER-BAG FOR A 16-INCH GUN.]
These offers were, of course, predicated on our continuing to furnish all
raw material, all rough-machined forgings, and all finished components
in quantities at least equal to those which we had been shipping to our
allies since our entry into the war for finishing or assembly abroad. By
our acceptance of these offers we not only obtained a breathing spell
which enabled us to plan an ordnance programme which would insure the
maximum production of artillery and artillery ammunition by the close of
1918, but the new arrangement, coming into effect at a period when the
submarine sinkings were at their height, insured us against the possible
loss of the raw material only and not also the time and labor which we
would have had to put into the finished article. In other words, by this
co-operative arrangement we increased our production to the maximum and
reduced our possible losses to the minimum. How the French regarded this
arrangement is shown by the words of M. André Tardieu, then French High
Commissioner in the United States:
“From the industrial view-point the unity of effort created will produce
happy results without precedent. From the financial standpoint it is
possible to hope that the purchase by the United States of French
artillery material will create an improvement in exchange, much to be
desired. From the military point of view it is evident that uniformity of
type of guns and munitions for armies fighting on the same battle-fields
is an appreciable guarantee of efficiency.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account