The army behind the armyPowell, E. Alexander (Edward Alexander)
History
The army behind the army
Powell, E. Alexander (Edward Alexander)
United States. Army; World War, 1914-1918 -- United States
Thus it will be seen that it took England nearly four years to completely
equip her army with artillery and ammunition. On that basis we had
two years and five months to go before incomplete equipment with
American-made artillery could have been condemned, with justification,
as poor performance. The nineteen months which the war lasted after
America’s entry did not give sufficient time for our industrial power
to make itself fully felt. Even so, I don’t suppose that any one, save
perhaps the profiteers, would wish the war to have lasted long enough for
us to prove that we could produce artillery as rapidly as our allies.
It should be kept in mind that proper strategy demanded an ordnance
programme designed to insure an _ultimate_ overwhelming and continuous
rate of production rather than a lesser rate of production at an earlier
date. What I wish to get across to you (pardon the slang) is that the
primary object of Ordnance was not to obtain immediate production of
enough artillery and ammunition to equip our little First Contingent, but
to obtain a _rate of production_ which would provide for the equipment
of the army of 5,000,000 men which it had been decided to raise. Now it
is perfectly obvious to any one that a housewife could buy a stove and
bake a dozen loaves of bread in far less time than would be required to
build a bakery and bake enough bread to feed an entire city. But the rate
of production from the housewife’s oven would never feed the city. So it
was with ordnance. By the sacrifice of far more important considerations,
there is no doubt that enough guns could have been produced in a
comparatively short time to equip the first few divisions. In order to
do this, time was required for building plants capable of such a rate
of production. We had to obtain designs and even, in certain cases, to
discard existing designs, in order to get manufacturing plants on a
basis permitting such a rate of production. It would have been madness
to have sacrificed production in 1920 to force a quicker but far smaller
production in 1918. The Ordnance Department was not directing its efforts
to obtain for American arms an immediate but isolated success, gratifying
as such a success would have been to American pride; instead it was
building a machine which would make an ultimate and sweeping victory
absolutely certain.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account