The army behind the armyPowell, E. Alexander (Edward Alexander)
History
The army behind the army
Powell, E. Alexander (Edward Alexander)
United States. Army; World War, 1914-1918 -- United States
But, even had the Allies been aware of Germany’s intention to make use
of toxic-gases for military purposes, they would still have been at an
enormous disadvantage, because, as a direct result of her policy of
giving government assistance to certain industries, Germany had several
huge gas-plants, connected with her dye manufactories, in operation when
the war began. Now phosgene, which is comparatively easy to produce,
is used extensively in the manufacture of dyes, which explains why the
Germans had a virtual monopoly of it when they decided to utilize it
for the promotion of dying instead of dyeing. The German Government,
it should be remembered, had for years subsidized the entire chemical
industry of the empire, so that when the war began it had at its
disposal scores of establishments devoted to the production of dyestuffs
and pharmaceutical preparations, in the production of which certain
toxic-gases are an important factor, which were converted, literally
overnight, to military purposes. Though there is no data regarding the
German gas production available, it was probably in the neighborhood
of 30 tons a day. It may have reached 50 tons, but certainly not
more. Though the English, realizing how desperate was the situation,
utilized every facility they could command, their total daily output
of toxic-gases never went above 30 tons. The best the French could do
was much below this. Yet at Edgewood, during the months of September
and October, 1918, when the plant had been in operation only a few
months, the output averaged 140 tons a day and would have gone much
higher had the war continued. In other words, _Edgewood Arsenal alone
produced nearly twice as much gas per day as Germany, France, and England
together_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account