The art of music. Vol. 01 (of 14) : $b The pre-Classic periods
History
The art of music. Vol. 01 (of 14) : $b The pre-Classic periods
Music -- History and criticism; Musicians
The works of many of the ninth century theorists such as Aurelian of
Réomé, and Remy of Auxerre, suggest that some form of part-singing
was practised in their day, though they leave us in confusion owing
to the ambiguity of their language. The famous scholar Scotus Erigena
(880) mentions organum, but in a passage that is difficult and obscure.
Regino, abbot of Prum in 892, is the first to define consonance and
dissonance in such a way as to leave no doubt that he considers them
from the point of view of polyphony, that is to say, as sounds that are
the result of two different notes sung simultaneously. In the works of
Hucbald of St. Amand in Flanders, quite at the end of the century, if
not well into the tenth (Hucbald died in 930 or 932, over ninety years
of age), there is at last a definite and clear description of organum.
The word organum is an adaptation of the name of the instrument on
which the art could be imitated, or, perhaps, from which it partly
originated, the organ; just as the Greeks coined a word from magadis.
Of Hucbald’s life little is known save that he was born about 840,
that he was a monk, a poet, and a musician, a disciple of St. Remy
of Auxerre and a friend of St. Odo of Cluny. Up to within recent
years several important works on music were attributed to him, of
which only one seems now to be actually his--the tract, _De Harmonica
Institutione_, of which several copies are in existence. This and
the _Musica Enchiriadis_ of his friend St. Odo are responsible for
the widespread belief that polyphony actually sprang from a hideous
progression of empty fourths and fifths. Both theorists, in their
efforts to confine the current form of extemporized descant in the
strict bounds of theory, reduced it thus: to a given melody taken
from the plain-song of the church the descanter or organizer added
another at the interval of a fifth or fourth below, which followed
the first melody or _cantus firmus_ note by note in strictly parallel
movement. The fourth seems to have been regarded as the pleasanter
of the intervals, though, as we shall see, it led composers into
difficulties, to overcome which Hucbald himself proposed a relaxation
of the stiff parallel movement between the parts. In the strict organum
or _diaphony_ the movement was thus:
[Illustration: Music]
Either or both of the parts might be doubled at the octave, in which
case the diaphony was called composite.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account