The art of music, Vol. 02 (of 14) : $b Classicism and Romanticism
History
The art of music, Vol. 02 (of 14) : $b Classicism and Romanticism
Music -- History and criticism; Musicians
For a century and a quarter the mob of July 14th has stood like a wall
between the Middle Ages and modern times. No less than modern politics,
modern thought and all its artistic expression date from 1789. For,
against the authority of hereditary rules and rulers, the mob of
the Bastille proclaimed another authority, namely that of facts. The
notion that forms should square with facts and not facts with forms
then became the basis of men’s thinking. This truth had existed as a
theory in the minds of individual thinkers for many decades--even for
many centuries. But the Parisian mob first revealed the truth of it
by enacting it as a fact. From that fact the truth spread among men’s
minds, forcing them, according to their lights, to bring all forms
and authorities to the test of facts. Babies, who were to be the next
generation’s great men, were brought up in this kind of thought and
were subtly inoculated with it so that their later thinking was based
upon it, whether they would or no. And so men have come to ask of a
monarch, not whether he is a legitimate son of his house, but whether
he derives his authority from the will of the nation. They have come
to ask of a philosophy, not whether it is consistent, but whether it
is true. And they have come to ask of an art-form, not whether it is
perfect, but whether it is fitting to its subject-matter.
When we come to compare the music of the nineteenth century with that
of the century preceding we find a contrast as striking as that between
the state of Europe as Napoleon left it with that as he found it. The
Europe of the eighteenth century was for the most part a conglomeration
of petty states, without national feeling, without standing armies in
the modern sense--states which their princes ruled as private property
for the supplying of their personal wants, with power of life and death
over their subjects; states whose soldiers ran away after the second
volley and whose warfare was little more than a formal and rather
stupid chess game; states whose statesmanship was the merest personal
intrigue of favorites. Among these states a few half-trained mobs of
revolutionary armies spread terror, and the young Napoleon amazed them
by demonstrating that soldiers who had their hearts in a great cause
could outfight those who had not.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account