The art of music, Vol. 02 (of 14) : $b Classicism and Romanticism
History
The art of music, Vol. 02 (of 14) : $b Classicism and Romanticism
Music -- History and criticism; Musicians
It was inevitable that the pure symphonic form should decline in
esteem during the romantic period; for it is based primarily on a love
of pure design--the ‘da capo’ scheme of statement, development, and
restatement, which remains the best method ever invented for vividly
presenting musical ideas without extra-musical association or aid. It
is primarily a mold for receiving ‘pure’ musical material, and the
romantic period, as we have seen, had comparatively little use for
music without poetic association. Of the best symphonies of the time
the greater part have some general poetical designation, like the
‘Italian’ and ‘Scotch’ symphonies of Mendelssohn, or the ‘Spring’ and
‘Rhenish’ symphonies of Schumann. These titles were in some cases mere
afterthoughts or concessions to the demands of the time, and in every
case the merest general or whimsical suggestion. Yet they can easily
be imagined as fitting the musical material, and they always manage
to add interest to the work without interfering with the ‘absolute’
musical value. And even when they are without specific title they are
infused with the spirit of the age--delight in sensuous effects and
rich scoring, emotional melody, and varied harmonic support.
For all this, as for nearly everything else in modern music, we must
go back to Beethoven if we wish to find the source, but for purposes
of classification Schubert may be set down as the first romantic
symphonist. He adhered as closely as he could to the classical mold,
though he never had a predominant gift for form. A beautiful melody
was to him the law-giver for all things, and when he found such a
melody it went its way refusing to submit to the laws of proportion.
Yet this willfulness can hardly be regarded as standing in the way
of outward success; the ‘Unfinished’ symphony in B minor could not
be better loved than it is; it is safe to say that of all symphonies
it is the most popular. It was written (two movements and a few bars
of a scherzo) in 1822, was laid aside for no known reason, and lay
unknown in Vienna for many years until rescued by Sir George Grove. The
mysterious introduction in the ‘cellos and basses, as though to say,
‘It happened once upon a time’; the haunting ‘second theme’ introduced
by the ‘cellos; the stirring development with its shrieks of the
wood-wind--all are of the very stuff of romantic music. A purist might
wish the work less diffuse, especially in the second movement; no one
could wish it more beautiful. In the great C major symphony, written
in the year of his death, Schubert seems to have been attempting a
_magnum opus_. If he had lived, this work would certainly have been
regarded as the first composition of his ‘second period.’ He labored
over it with much more care than was his custom, and showed a desire to
attain a cogent form with truly orchestral ideas. The best parts of the
‘Unfinished Symphony’ could be sung by the human voice; the melodies
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account