The art of music, Vol. 02 (of 14) : $b Classicism and Romanticism
History
The art of music, Vol. 02 (of 14) : $b Classicism and Romanticism
Music -- History and criticism; Musicians
Mozart’s inspiration was primarily a melodic one and for that reason
we see him purposely subordinating the harmonic substructure and often
reducing it to its simplest terms. If he employs at times figures of
accompaniment which are obvious and even trite, it is done with an
evident purpose to throw into relief the individuality of his melodies,
those rich broideries and graceful arabesques which Mozart knew how to
weave about a simple ‘tonic and dominant.’ No composer ever achieved
such variety within so limited a harmonic range. On the other hand,
it has been truthfully said that Mozart was the greatest polyphonist
between Bach and Brahms. He was able to make the most learned use of
contrapuntal devices when occasion demanded, but never in the use
of these devices did he descend to dry formalism. His _incidental_
use of counterpoint often produces the most telling effects; the
accentuation of a motive by imitation, a caressing counter-melody to
add poignancy to an expressive phrase, the reciprocal germination of
musical ideas, all these he applies with consummate science and without
ever sacrificing ingenuous spontaneity. Again in his harmonic texture
there are moments of daring which perplexed his contemporaries and even
to-day are open to dispute. The sudden injection of a dissonant note
into an apparently tranquil harmonic relation, such as in the famous
C-major Quartet, which aroused such violent discussion when first
heard, or in the first Allegro theme of the _Don Giovanni_ overture, is
his particularly favorite way of introducing ‘color.’
This chromaticism of Mozart’s is one of the striking differences
between his music and Haydn’s. ‘Haydn makes his richest point of color
by sheer abrupt modulation; Mozart by iridescent chromatic motion
within the limits of a clearly defined harmonic sequence.’[45] In
drawing a further comparison between the two Viennese masters we find
in Haydn a greater simplicity and directness of expression, a more
unadorned, unhesitating utterance, as against Mozart, to whom perfectly
chiselled phrases, a polished, graceful manner of speech are second
nature, whether his mood is gay or sad, his emotions careless or deep.
The distinction is aptly illustrated by the juxtaposition of the
following two themes quoted in Vol. IV of the ‘Oxford History of Music.’
[Illustration: Haydn: Finale of Quartet in G (Op. 33, N.º 5)]
[Illustration: Mozart: Finale of Quartet in D-minor (K. 421)]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account