The art of music, Vol. 04 (of 14) : $b Music in America
History
The art of music, Vol. 04 (of 14) : $b Music in America
Music -- History and criticism; Musicians
New York is often accused of being peculiarly non-representative
of typical American life. The accusation is, in a measure, just
and holds good in its application to musical conditions. As the
metropolis, where, without doubt, more music than anywhere else in the
country is heard, New York lacks a local life of its own; there is
no feeling of neighborly companionship among its art workers, and in
consequence there hardly exists that which we could term a New York
'group' of composers in the sense to which the term is applied to
Boston's community of music-makers. New York claims as citizens many
of America's best known composers, but they figure too little in the
musical life of the city and are the objects of too little local pride.
An exception to this, however, is found in the case of Arthur
Whiting, whose concerts bring him often into public view and whose
local reputation as a pianist is undoubtedly far greater than his
recognition as a composer. Deserving of the latter, however--and
that by reason of a very serious and notable achievement in creative
fields--Arthur Whiting must be counted as one of the real ornaments of
America's list of composers. Mr. Whiting's well-known Brahms enthusiasm
and his activities as a producer of Brahms' works bring upon him
the suspicion of being a thorough-going Brahmsite, even in his own
compositions; a suspicion, however, not well founded, for Mr. Whiting
is quite free from the Brahms influence. That he is ofttimes prone to
intellectuality, and too rarely gives himself up to the spontaneous
and expressively beautiful, is perhaps a more just accusation, but the
statement that Mr. Whiting is an artist of deep sincerity, of high
ideals, and of thorough equipment must remain unchallenged.
Mr. Whiting's recent work has been almost exclusively in the smaller
forms. He has, however, in the past written several larger works, the
best known of which is his Fantasie for piano and orchestra. This
work, recently revived at a concert given by the American Academy,
has a rhythmic energy that makes it 'American' in the best sense--a
genuine and spontaneous expression of the national nervously intense
temperament. For the most part, however, the orchestra has seemed to
have but small inspiration to offer to him and his sober formal sense
and his own distinctions of style lead him more naturally to the piano,
the vocal quartet, and to other chamber music combinations as his
medium of expression.
Henry Holden Huss is principally known through his successful handling
of the larger forms and he can point with just pride to the real
success which has been that of his piano concerto in D minor, his
violin concerto, and his sonata for violin and piano. These, as well as
a sonata for violoncello and piano, have all found acceptance with a
number of the best living interpretive musicians, who have given Huss a
very wide hearing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account