The art of music, Vol. 06 (of 14) : $b Choral and church musicCole, Rossetter G. (Rossetter Gleason)
History
The art of music, Vol. 06 (of 14) : $b Choral and church music
Cole, Rossetter G. (Rossetter Gleason)
Music -- History and criticism; Musicians
The _Te Deum Laudamus_ (‘We praise Thee, O God’) seems to owe its
origin to Nicetas, Bishop of Remesiana in Dacia (about A. D. 400), and
it was at once used as an important part of the Nocturns or Matins.
Music was used with it from the beginning, in fact the words were used
with chants already existent. It is in three parts or sections. The
praise of the Trinity occupies all of the first section; ‘Thou art the
King of Glory’ begins the second section, which ends with two verses
of prayer, ‘We therefore pray Thee’ and ‘Make them to be numbered.’
The third section begins with ‘O Lord, save Thy people and bless Thine
heritage.’ It was at first sung to a free chant but was later developed
into complex settings for solos, chorus and elaborate accompaniment.
While it is a part of the service of both the Roman and the Anglican
Churches, the finest examples of this great canticle seem to come from
England, that by Purcell, written for St. Cecilia’s Day, 1694, and
published in 1697, being one of the earliest large ones, and indeed one
of the greatest Te Deums. This was doubtless the model for Handel’s
‘Utrecht Te Deum,’ written in 1712, which is even a nobler work than
that by Purcell. These, together with the ones of Macfarren and
Sullivan, that of Dvořák in 1896, Stanford’s, performed at the Leeds
Festival in 1898, and Parry’s, performed at the Hereford Festival of
1900, are the most famous Te Deums of modern times.
II
The decadence in church-music that began to set in early in the
seventeenth century and that soon caused the glories of the ‘Palestrina
style’ to disappear, may be traced, not so much to the monodic
revolution and the consequent change in the style of writing it
entailed, but primarily to the fact that the composers of church music
in the main wrote at the same time for church and theatre. Blinded
by the greater brilliance of the stage, they were not able to keep
separate these two widely divergent styles and the operatic mode of
speech soon found entrance into the church service, and later there was
very little to distinguish the one style from the other. This condition
continued uninterrupted until the movement for the restoration of
Catholic Church music was started near the middle of the nineteenth
century by Kaspar Ett (1788-1847) and Karl Proske (1794-1861), and
further developed by Franz Witt (1834-1888) and the Cecilian Society.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account