The art of music, Vol. 07 (of 14) : $b Pianoforte and chamber music
History
The art of music, Vol. 07 (of 14) : $b Pianoforte and chamber music
Music -- History and criticism; Musicians
Mozart did not compose his piano music at the piano, as Schumann
and Chopin did. The improvisations were not remembered later and
put down in form upon paper. They seem to have been something apart
from his composing. He wrote music away from the piano, at his desk,
as most people write letters--in the words of his wife. Most of the
sonatas, too, were written for the benefit of pupils. Few of them
make actually trying demands upon technical brilliance. Their great
difficulty is more than technical, or than what is commonly regarded
as technical--strength, velocity, and endurance. Yet no music more
instantly lays bare any lack of evenness or any stiffness in the
fingers. Mozart cared little for a brilliant style. His opinion of
Clementi has already been mentioned. He preferred rather a moderate
than an extremely rapid tempo, condemned severely any inaccuracy or
carelessness, likewise any lack of clearness in rhythm. But, above all,
he laid emphasis on a beautiful and singing quality of tone.
His avoidance rather than cultivation of brilliancy alone makes
his music often suggest the harpsichord. There is an absence of
the technical devices then new, which have since become thoroughly
associated with the pianoforte style. Yet from 1777 Mozart devoted
himself to the pianoforte. An instrument made especially for him, which
he invariably used in his many concerts in Vienna, has been preserved.
The keyboard has a range of five octaves, from the F below the bass
staff to the F above the treble staff. The action is very light, the
tone rather sharp and strong. It can be damped, or softened, by means
of a stop which pulls a strip of felt into position between the strings
and the hammers.
Concerning the pianoforte sonatas it may be said again that few depart
from a normal, prevailing mood. Some are exceptional. Knowing his
great gift of improvising and how rich and varied his improvisations
were, it is perhaps a temptation to read into them more definite
emotions than are really implied. Yet it is easy to pick from the later
sonatas at least three which not only differ considerably from the
earlier sonatas, but differ likewise from each other. Nevertheless,
two or three traits are common to them all. They mark Mozart’s sonatas
distinctly from Haydn’s and, indeed, from all other sonatas.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account