The art of music, Vol. 07 (of 14) : $b Pianoforte and chamber music
History
The art of music, Vol. 07 (of 14) : $b Pianoforte and chamber music
Music -- History and criticism; Musicians
It is urged against Chopin that he wrote only for the pianoforte. But
this cannot have any weight in estimating the value of his music. It
is generally acknowledged that the pianoforte is of all instruments
the most difficult to write for. Chopin was absolute master of these
difficulties, just as Wagner was master of the orchestra. He was
therefore in a position to give perfect expression to his ideas, as
far as color of sound is concerned. Mr. Edgar Stillman Kelley in his
recent book on Chopin[35] brings forward the interesting point that
at the time Chopin was composing--roughly between 1830 and 1845--the
orchestra would have been quite inadequate to the expression of his
ideas; both because of the imperfections of many of the instruments and
because of the lack of virtuoso skill among the players. For Chopin’s
music is above all things intricate. There is a ceaseless interweaving
of countless strands of harmony, a subtle chromaticism of which the
brass instruments would have been incapable, and elaborate figures
and passages which violinists would not have been able to play. The
pianoforte on the other hand was relatively perfect. To it Chopin
turned, as to a medium that would not restrict his expression. And
so accurately and minutely did he shape his music in accordance with
the instrument, that the many attempts by clever and skillful men to
arrange it for the orchestra have almost entirely failed.
At any rate we have Chopin’s ideas perfectly expressed, almost without
a blemish, thanks to the piano. It is by the nature and quality of
these ideas that he must be judged. In beauty of melody, in wealth of
harmony, in variety, force, and delicacy of rhythm, he has not been
excelled. As to the quality of emotion back of these ideas, it has been
said that it is perfervid, sickly or effeminate; but such a statement
would hardly be borne out by the facts that his music remains fresh
in expressiveness and that it is generally acceptable. Delicate most
of it is, and it is all marked by a perhaps unique fineness of taste.
This, however, rarely if ever belittles the genuine and lasting emotion
which it modifies. Chopin’s character was undoubtedly one that wins
the love and sympathy of some men, and wholly antagonizes others. The
last years of his life he was weak and ailing and he was never robust.
Still it cannot be fairly said that his physical weakness has affected
his music. It should be remembered that Beethoven and Schumann were
sick men, the one sick in body, the other sick in mind. The wonder is
but greater when we think that such works as the Ballade in F minor and
the Barcarolle were written by a man so feeble that he had always to be
carried up flights of stairs.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account