The art of music, Vol. 07 (of 14) : $b Pianoforte and chamber music
History
The art of music, Vol. 07 (of 14) : $b Pianoforte and chamber music
Music -- History and criticism; Musicians
Little enough is known of him, and that little smacks of faëry. He
was probably born in Venice in 1717. He died about 1740, probably in
Rome. Only twenty-three, masters, but he tied his bass to the tail of
music and there it swings to this day. But more of the bass anon. He
was an amateur, according to Laborde,[23] a pupil of Biffi and Lotti.
He was a beautiful singer. At least we read that he went to Madrid in
the train of the Venetian ambassador, and astonished Farinelli, one of
the greatest and most idolized singers of the day, who was then living
in high favor at the Spanish court. Later he came back to Rome, where
he recommended himself to the patronage of a certain Marquis Molinari.
About 1737 he set two of Metastasio’s libretti, _Endymion_ and
_Galatea_, to music, which was, according to Laborde, highly esteemed.
All his teachers recalled him with great enthusiasm. He could so play
on the harpsichord, so improvise, that he charmed large assemblies
during whole nights. And sometimes he would go abroad at night through
the streets of Rome with his lute, singing, followed by a crowd of
delighted amateurs. He died young and much regretted. Laborde closes
his article by saying that Alberti wrote thirty-six sonatas which are
said to be superb, and of a new kind (_d’un genre neuf_). Laborde’s
article, though pleasing, is a bit highly colored. From it we have a
right only to infer that Alberti was lovable, a good singer and a good
player. That he speaks of the sonatas as being of a new sort, however,
should not be forgotten.
Dr. Burney mentions Alberti twice in his ‘Present State of Music in
Germany,’ both times in connection with his stay in Vienna in the
autumn of 1772, more than thirty years after Alberti’s death. Once
it is to give his name among the seven men who were at that time
considered to be the greatest composers for harpsichord and for organ.
Other names were Handel, Scarlatti, and Bach (either Emanuel or
Christian: the father was not then generally appreciated). High company
for poor Alberti, from which he since has fallen most low. But that he
should have been reckoned with such men thirty years after his death,
speaks irrefutably for the influence his works must have had, for a
time, at any rate, upon the development of pianoforte music.
Reference was made in the second chapter to the other mention of
Alberti in Dr. Burney’s book. It occurred in connection with Dr.
L’Augier’s reminiscences of D. Scarlatti. Scarlatti had told the
eminent physician that he had always borne in mind, while writing his
pieces for the harpsichord, the special qualities of that instrument,
whereas other ‘modern’ composers, like Alberti, were now writing in
a style that would be more fitting to other instruments. In the case
of Alberti, Scarlatti must have had the voice in mind, for Alberti’s
harpsichord sonatas are hardly more than strings of melodies.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account