English poetry -- History and criticism; Poetry -- Early works to 1800
The first is a good _spondeus_, the second a good _iambus_, and if the
same wordes be broken thus it is not so pleasant.
_I`n e-x tre-ame de` sire_
And yet the first makes a _iambus_, and the second a _trocheus_ ech
sillable retayning still his former quantities. And alwaies ye must haue
regard to the sweetenes of the meetre, so as if your word _polysillable_
would not sound pleasantly whole, ye should for the nonce breake him,
which ye may easily doo by inserting here and there one _monosillable_
among your _polysillables_, or by changing your word into another place
then where he soundes vnpleasantly, and by breaking, turne a _trocheus_ to
a _iambus_, or contrariwise: as thus:
_Ho-llo`w va-lle`is u-nde`r hi-e`st mou-ntai`nes
Cra-ggi`e cli-ffes bri`ng foo-rth the` fai-re`st fou-ntai`nes_
These verses be _trochaik_, and in mine eare not so sweete and harmonicall
as the _iambicque_, thus:
_The` ho-llo`wst va-ls li`e u-nde`r hi-e`st mo-unta-ines
The` cra-ggi`st clifs bri-ng fo-rth the` fai-re`st fou-nta-ines_.
All which verses bee now become _iambicque_ by breaking the first
_bissillables_, and yet alters not their quantities though the feete be
altered: and thus,
_Restlesse is the heart in his desires
Rauing after that reason doth denie_.
Which being turned thus makes a new harmonie.
_The restlesse heart, renues his old desires
Ay rauing after that reason doth it deny_.
And following this obseruation your meetres being builded with
_polysillables_ will fall diuersly out, that is some to be
_spondaick_, some _iambick_, others _dactilick_, others _trochaick_, and
of one mingled with another, as in this verse.
_He-aui`e I-s the` bu-rde`n of Pri`nce`s i-re_
The verse is _trochaick_, but being altered thus, is _iambicque_.
_Fu`ll he-aui`e i-s the` pa-ise o`f Pri-nce`s i-re_
And as _Sir Thomas Wiat_ song in a verse wholly _trochaick_, because the
wordes do best shape to that foote by their naturall accent, thus,
_Fa-rewe`ll lo-ue a`nd a-ll thi`e la-wes fo`r e-ve`r_
And in this ditty of th'Erle of Surries, passing sweete and harmonicall:
all be _Iambick_.
_When raging loue with extreme paine
So cruell doth straine my hart,
And that the teares like fluds of raine
Beare witnesse of my wofull smart._
Which beyng disposed otherwise or not broken, would proue all _trochaick_,
but nothing pleasant.
Now furthermore ye are to note, that al _monosyllables_ may receiue the
sharp accent, but not so aptly one as another, as in this verse where they
serue well to make him _iambicque_, but not _trochaick_.
_Go`d grau-nt thi`s pea-ce ma`y lo-ng e`ndu-re_
Where the sharpe accent falles more tunably vpon [graunt] [peace] [long]
[dure] then it would by conuersion, as to accent then thus:
_Go-d grau`nt - thi-s pea`ce - ma-y lo`ng - e-ndu-re._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account