The ascendancy of France, 1598-1715Wakeman, Henry Offley
History
The ascendancy of France, 1598-1715
Wakeman, Henry Offley
Europe -- History -- 17th century
In the Form of Government adopted in 1634, Sweden received from
Oxenstjerna’s hands the first of modern written constitutions. By it
Lutheranism in the form of the Confession of Augsburg was imposed upon
the sovereign and all his subjects. Government was vested in the king,
advised by a senate of twenty members chosen by him from the nobility,
to whom were added five _ex officio_ members being the great
officers of state, _i.e._ the steward, the marshal, the treasurer,
the chancellor and the admiral. The whole direction of affairs during
the illness or minority of the king was placed in their hands, subject
only to the provision that all laws passed, privileges conferred, and
alienation of crown lands effected during the incapacity of the king
must receive his subsequent ratification. Other provisions of a less
important nature regulated the administration of justice, but in all of
them the same care for securing the supremacy of the noble and official
class is everywhere observable. In fact, the result of the Form of
Government was to place the chief direction of affairs in Sweden for
nearly fifty years in the hands of a narrow aristocratic clique of
official families. During the minority of Christina, no less than three
out of the five great officers of state were members of the Oxenstjerna
family alone. [Sidenote: =The government a narrow oligarchy.=]
The policy of the regency was conceived in the interests of the
nobility. They profited by the continuance of the war in Germany, for
to them fell the high commands in the army, and the opportunities of
amassing wealth by plunder and confiscation. They profited equally by
the necessities of the Crown at home, for they became the possessors
either by purchase or grant of large tracts of crown lands made over to
them by the government, partly to secure their loyalty and partly to
relieve its embarrassments. But what was meat to the nobles was poison
to the peasantry. The people soon found that the court noble or the
successful general was a far harder master to serve than ever the Crown
had been. The long-continued war raised the taxes, checked the growth
of manufactures, and drained the country of its best peasant blood,
only to return to it a body of brigand soldiers ruined in morals and
incapable of honest industry. Had it lasted but a few years longer, it
is by no means improbable that Oxenstjerna would have found that he
had purchased a foreign empire at the cost of a domestic revolution.
The quick intelligence of Christina, brought up as she was in Sweden,
while the Chancellor was forced to spend a large part of his time in
Germany, appreciated the danger; and this, quite as much as her natural
humanity, prompted her to put an end to a war, which had ceased to have
a serious political object, and was being waged in the interests of a
class and in honour of a memory.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account