The ascendancy of France, 1598-1715Wakeman, Henry Offley
History
The ascendancy of France, 1598-1715
Wakeman, Henry Offley
Europe -- History -- 17th century
afterwards denied permission to visit the French court at Paris, and
found among French women her most persistent detractors.
Abdications among sovereigns are so rare that the attention of
historians has been naturally attracted by the picturesqueness of that
of Christina to the detriment of her real title to fame. [Sidenote:
=Her political ability.=] In the ten years of her rule over Sweden
she conducted a great war to a glorious end, she established her
authority by sheer ascendency of character over a narrow and jealous
oligarchy, she settled a most difficult constitutional question, that
of the devolution of the Crown, in the best way for the nation, by
her own firmness of will. She made herself beloved by her people, and
easily suppressed the conspiracy of Messenius in spite of its wide
ramifications among the democracy. She made Stockholm for the time
the most learned and cultured court of Europe. Above all when her own
religious convictions forced her into antagonism with the constitution
of her country, she never hesitated to prefer the interests of her
country to her own dignity. She recognised from the first that in
the seventeenth century it was impossible for Sweden to permit her
sovereign to be of any religion except that of Luther, and when she had
made up her mind to become a Roman Catholic she accepted the inevitable
and abdicated her throne. There are few sovereigns who can claim to
have done more for their country by activity or by renunciation than
Christina. Her abdication was right and unavoidable. The mistake she
made lay in not carrying it far enough. She ought to have retired into
private life, but this was too great a self-denial for so active a
mind and so vigorous a personality. She ceased to be queen of Sweden,
but she determined still to be queen. She maintained royal state, she
claimed royal rights, she plunged into intrigue, she interfered in
politics, she tried to dominate over literature and taste. Deprived of
all right to express, and shorn of all power to enforce, her wishes,
she soon sank into becoming the common bore of Europe, and found
herself politely relegated to her palace at Rome, where she became one
of the sights of the city and the leader of a fashionable and artistic
côterie.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account