The ascendancy of France, 1598-1715Wakeman, Henry Offley
History
The ascendancy of France, 1598-1715
Wakeman, Henry Offley
Europe -- History -- 17th century
But to do it in dependence on mere
brute force was political suicide. Without the armies of Tilly and
Wallenstein the Edict of Restitution was a dead letter, with them it
was a military revolution. By it the Emperor stood out to the world
as the author of a religious and political revolution, the success
of which depended entirely upon military despotism, and was without
any moral basis whatever. Germany would not be revolutionised by such
measures as these.
CHAPTER V
THE THIRTY YEARS’ WAR FROM THE PEACE OF
LÜBECK TO THE PEACE OF PRAGUE
Difference between Wallenstein and the Emperor--Opposition of
the League to Wallenstein--Dismissal of Wallenstein--Critical
state of Protestantism in Germany--Condition of Sweden--Policy of
Gustavus Adolphus--His wars with Denmark, Russia, and Poland--His
interference in Germany and Alliance with France--The Campaign
of 1631 and sack of Magdeburg--Alliance between Saxony and
Sweden--Battle of Breitenfeld--Military successes and political
difficulties of Gustavus--Wallenstein appointed dictator--Gustavus
baffled by Wallenstein at Nuremburg--Battle of Lützen--The League of
Heilbronn--The murder of Wallenstein--The battle of Nördlingen--The
Peace of Prague--Policy of John George of Saxony.
[Sidenote: =Difference of policy between Wallenstein and
Ferdinand.=]
The recklessness with which Ferdinand had undertaken to revolutionise
Germany soon made itself apparent. To crush the political opposition
of Denmark and the lower Saxon circle, he had had to call to his aid
Wallenstein and his personal army. To carry out the far more difficult
task of transferring from Protestants to Catholics large districts
of north Germany, which had been for eighty or ninety years in the
hands of Protestants, and of forcibly converting to his own religion
thousands of Protestant Germans, he had but the same force upon which
to rely. It was idle to think that the Edict of Restitution could be
carried out without the help of soldiers. It was certain that Tilly and
the troops of the League would not suffice to enforce the Edict and
resist the threatened advance of Sweden. To whom could the Emperor turn
except to Wallenstein and his 60,000 men? Yet it was just here that he
was least sure of his ground. Wallenstein himself strongly disapproved
of the policy of the Edict. It ran counter to the principle of
religious equality upon which he had organised his own power. His army
was the only place in Europe where Catholics, Lutherans, and Calvinists
met on equal terms and served loyally one with another as comrades.
To put an army organised on such a basis to the work of ousting
Protestant clergy and superintending conversions would split it to its
very foundations. More than that. It was no mere caprice which had led
Wallenstein to make religious equality the basis of the organisation of
his army. He believed strongly that it was the only possible basis for
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account