The astounding crime on Torrington Road : $b Being an account of what might be termed "the Pentecost episode" in a most audacious criminal careerGillette, William
General
The astounding crime on Torrington Road : $b Being an account of what might be termed "the Pentecost episode" in a most audacious criminal career
Gillette, William
Detective and mystery stories; Murder -- Investigation -- Fiction
The evidence tending to establish the guilt of Augustus Findlay in
the case of the shooting to death of Charles Michael Haworth was so
overwhelming from the point of view of newspaper readers, that it
threatened to make the case uninteresting—a threat, however, which
was soon swept into the discard. For a few days, though, it looked
unpromising in the extreme to those who revel in newspaper sewerage.
The facts were so plain and Findlay’s guilt so evident that no room was
left for enthralling suspicions as to others—for gossip and scandal,
for the laying bare of nauseous details concerning the habits and
lives of loathsome people, and all those choice morsels of offal that
newspaper addicts go after so ravenously.
It was simply that this Findlay man, the murderer, had always been
threatening to put a bullet into the Haworth man, the murdered, and
had finally done so, being worked up to a sufficient frenzy in his
half-drunken condition, by finding the said Haworth calling upon
his—Findlay’s—wife. He had thereupon followed him home, flourishing a
revolver in his face most of the way and shouting the most murderous
threats and maledictions, and finally had shot him from outside the
Cripps mansion on Torrington Road (where Haworth lived) getting it
there through one of the front windows. Then he had run home and tried
to make his wife uphold him in his statement that he hadn’t left the
house all the evening. If that wasn’t enough to land him in the chair,
what was?
To the authorities, however, it wasn’t quite so easy navigation. No one
had seen Findlay do the deed; no revolver had been found; no bullet
marks in the room had yet been discovered. It was true that everything
pointed to him as the murderer, but pointing wasn’t enough. It answers
very nicely for the general public, but doesn’t go with a Grand Jury.
And there was that obstinate old woman who undoubtedly had intimate
knowledge of the entire episode from A to Z—knowing the persons
involved, the motives behind the murderous deed, and every circumstance
leading up to it;—for hadn’t she run out and warned a patrolman in
Jamaica Plain nearly a week before the event? Fully aware of this
and more, yet keeping her mouth as securely closed as if officially
padlocked. More important still if it was a fact—and a word or two
she’d dropped just after the shooting made it look that way—she’d been
an eyewitness of the murder. Yet so far nothing could be got out of her
on the subject.
But no mistake was made about Amelia Temple. It was seen from the first
that the only chance was in giving it to her easy and waiting patiently
for results. No pressure. On a sign of that she’d have cheerfully gone
to prison for life or permitted herself to be hung by the neck until
dead, before she’d have let out a word. So they kept careful watch on
her without interfering in any way with her freedom or giving her the
least idea they were doing it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account