The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 12, No. 71, September, 1863: A Magazine of Literature, Art, and PoliticsVarious
Religion
The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 12, No. 71, September, 1863: A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics
Various
American periodicals
archangelic intellect, shut out by a mighty shadow of eclipse from the
bright hopes and warm affections of all sunny hearts, could have
originated such a Pandemonian monster as the poem on "Darkness"? The
most striking specimen of Byron's imaginative power, and nearly the most
striking that has ever been produced, is the apostrophe to the sea, in
"Childe Harold." But what is it in the sea which affects Lord Byron's
susceptibilities to grandeur? Its destructiveness alone. And _how_? Is
it through any high moral purpose or meaning that seems to sway the
movements of destruction? No; it is only through the gloomy mystery of
the ruin itself,--ruin revealed upon a scale so vast and under
conditions of terror the most appalling,--ruin wrought under the
semblance of an almighty passion for revenge directed against the human
race. Thus, as an expression of the attitude which the sea maintains
toward man, we have the following passage of Æschylian grandeur, but
also of Æschylian gloom:--
"Thou dost arise
And shake him from thee; the vile strength he wields
For earth's destruction thou dost all despise,
Spurning him from thy bosom to the skies,
And send'st him, shivering in thy _playful_ spray,
And howling, to his gods, where haply lies
His petty hope in some near port or bay,
And dashest him again to earth: there let him lay!"
Who but this dark spirit, forever wooing the powers of darkness, and of
darkness the most sullen, praying to Nemesis alone, could, with such
lamentable lack of faith in the purity and soundness of human
affections, have given utterance to a sentiment like this:--
"O love! no habitant of earth thou art,--
An _unseen_ seraph we believe in thee"?
or the following:--
"Who loves, raves,--'tis youth's frenzy," etc.?
and again:--
"Few--_none_--find what they love or could have loved,
Though accident, blind contact, and the strong
Necessity of loving having removed
Antipathies"?
This, then, is the nearest approach to human love,--the removal of all
antipathies! But even these
"recur erelong,
Envenomed with irrevocable wrong:
And circumstance--that unspiritual god
And miscreator--makes and helps along
Our coming evils with a crutch-like rod,
Whose touch turns hope to dust,--the dust which all have trod."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account