The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 12, No. 73, November, 1863: A Magazine of Literature, Art, and PoliticsVarious
History
The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 12, No. 73, November, 1863: A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics
Various
American periodicals
But it will be observed that these records of this verse fail to mention
the immediate author. Was he unknown at the time? Or did the fact that
he was recently a cabinet-minister induce him to hide behind a mask?
Turgot was a master of epigram,--as witness the terrible lines on
Frederick of Prussia; but he was very prudent in conduct. "Nobody," said
Voltaire, "so skilful to launch the shaft without showing the hand." But
there is a letter from no less a person than D'Alembert, which reveals
something of the "filing" which this verse underwent, and something of
the persons consulted. Unhappily, the letter is without date; nor does
it appear to whom it was addressed, except that the "_cher confrere_"
seems to imply that it was to a brother of the Academy. This letter will
be found in a work which is now known to have been the compilation of
the Marquis Gaetan de La Rochefoucauld,[31] entitled, "Memoires de
Condorcet sur la Revolution Francaise, extraits de sa Correspondance et
de celle de ses Amis."[32] It is introduced by the following words from
the Marquis:--
"It is known how Franklin had been feted when he came to Paris, because
he was the representative of a republic. The philosophers, especially,
received him with enthusiasm. It may be said, among other things, that
D'Alembert lost his sleep; and we are going to prove it by a letter
which he wrote, where he put himself to the torture in order to versify
in honor of Franklin."
The letter is then given as follows:--
"_Friday Morning_.
"MY DEAR COLLEAGUE,--You are acquainted with the Franklin verse,--
'Eripuit coelo fulmen, _mox sceptra_ tyrannis.'
You should surely cause it to be put in the Paris paper, if it is
not there already.
"I should agree with La Harpe that _sceptrumque_ is better: first,
because _mox sceptra_ is a little hard, and then because _mox_,
according to the dictionary of Gesner, who collects examples,
signifies equally _statim_ or _deinde_, which causes a double
meaning, _mox eripuit_ or _mox eripiet_.
"However, here is how I have attempted to translate this verse for
the portrait of Franklin:--
'Tu vois le sage courageux
Dont l'heureux et male genie
Arracha le tonnerre aux dieux
Et le sceptre a la tyrannie.'
If you find these verses sufficiently supportable, so that people
will not laugh at me, you can put them into the Paris paper, even
with my name. I shall honor myself in rendering this homage to
Franklin, but on condition that you find the verses _printable_.
As I make no pretension on account of them, I shall be perfectly
content, if you reject them as bad.
"The third verse can be put,--_A ravi le tonnerre aux cieux_, or
_aux dieux_."
From this letter it appears that the critical judgment of La Harpe,
confirmed by D'Alembert, sided for _sceptrumque_ as better than _mox
sceptra_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account