The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 14, No. 81, July, 1864: A Magazine of Literature, Art, and PoliticsVarious
General
The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 14, No. 81, July, 1864: A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics
Various
American periodicals
We have postponed to this stage of our inquiry the consideration of that
rock upon which the Mexican State has finally split,--party-spirit.
During the forty stormy years of its existence, that ancient conflict,
ever old and ever new, between conservatism and radicalism, has been
going on. A statistician records that Mexico has had twenty-seven new
constitutions, or at least modifications of old ones, or final plans of
settlement. It has been too much the custom to talk of these as though
they were utterly meaningless. They are full of meaning. They mark the
flux and reflux of this great battle. They stand for the victories or
defeats of one or the other of these great principles.
It is not probable, that, at the outset of the Revolution, the Creoles
had any thought of separating from the mother-country. They professed
the greatest loyalty. And they proved it by unshaken fidelity on many a
bloody field. Their only request was, that some constitutional features
might mitigate the despotism under which they groaned. Even after eleven
years' struggle, what they settled upon was a limited monarchy, with the
King's son at its head,--or, if he refused, then some scion of another
royal house. And even when this project failed, they raised to the
vacant throne their own general, Iturbide. So strong in the beginning
was the element of conservatism, or reaction, as they term it now, in
Mexican affairs.
In 1823, however, the Liberal party obtained the supremacy, and under
the lead of Santa Ana, who then first came into prominence, drove
Iturbide from the throne, and put into operation a constitution
patterned after our own. It is not too much to say, that, from that day
to the hour when the allied troops landed at Vera Cruz, the conflict
between two parties, two principles, two methods of government, has been
waged with ever increasing bitterness and ever changing fortunes. It is
probable that the Liberals have always been numerically the stronger.
But the reactionary party has had its advantages. The rich and
aristocratic have been with it. To a great extent the army, ever partial
to the iron hand, has given it the support of its great power. And the
Church, which has possessed perhaps one-quarter of the whole wealth of
the country, and whose income has often far exceeded that of the State,
has always plotted for the downfall of the Liberals.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account