The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 20, No. 117, July, 1867: A Magazine of Literature, Science, Art, and PoliticsVarious
General
The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 20, No. 117, July, 1867: A Magazine of Literature, Science, Art, and Politics
Various
American periodicals
Had we regained Venice through a war directed as justice and the
exigencies of the case required, instead of basely submitting to the
humiliation of receiving it from the hands of a foreign despot, we
should have dissolved two empires, and called into existence a
Slavo-Magyaro-Teutonic federation along the Danube, and a
Slavo-Hellenic-Rouman federation in the east of Europe.
We shall not regain Rome without dissolving the Papacy, and proclaiming,
for the benefit of all humanity, that inviolability of conscience which
Protestantism achieved for a fraction of Europe only, and confined
within Biblical limits.
Great ideas make great peoples, and the sense of the enormous power
which is an inseparable condition of the existence of our Italy as a
nation should have sufficed to make us great. That sense, however,--God
alone knows the grief with which I write it,--that sense with us is
wanting.
And now a word as to the amnesty.
Were it my nature to allow any personal considerations to interfere
where the welfare of my country is concerned, I might answer that none
who know me would expect me to give the lie to the whole of my past
life, and sully the few years left to me by accepting an offer of
_oblivion_ and _pardon_ for having loved Italy above all earthly things,
and preached and striven for her unity when all others regarded it as a
dream.
But my purpose in the present writing is far other than self-defence;
and the sequel will show that, even were the sacrifice of the dignity of
my last years possible, it would be useless.
My past, present, and future labors towards the moral and political
regeneration of my country have been, are, and will be governed by a
religious idea.
The past, present, and future of our rulers have been, are, and will be
led astray by materialism.
Now the religious question sums up and dominates every other. Political
questions are necessarily secondary and derivative.
They who earnestly believe in the supremacy of the moral law as the sole
legitimate source of all authority--in a religion of duty, of which
politics should be the application--_cannot_, through any amount of
personal abnegation, act in concert with a government based upon the
worship of temporary and material interest.
Our rulers have no great ruling conception,--no belief in the supremacy
of the moral law,--no just notion of life, nor of the human unity,--no
belief in a divinely appointed goal which it is the _duty_ of mankind to
reach through labor and sacrifice. They are materialists, and the
logical consequence of their want of all faith in God and his law are
the substitution of the idea of _interest_ for the idea of _duty_,--of a
paltry notion of _tactics_, for the fearless affirmation of the
truth,--of opportunity, for principle.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account