The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 20, No. 119, September, 1867: A Magazine of Literature, Science, Art, and PoliticsVarious
General
The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 20, No. 119, September, 1867: A Magazine of Literature, Science, Art, and Politics
Various
American periodicals
Raoul de Montalvan was a young gentleman of moderate fortune, who, at
the age of twenty, sold his small estates in Avignon in order to equip a
company and join the Chevalier de Modène in the campaign of 1745, under
the Maréchal Saxe. At Fontenoy he was acknowledged to have distinguished
himself; but his recollections of that battle were embittered by the
fact that the Comte de Lally had robbed him of the honor which he most
coveted,--that of having detected, by a bold reconnoissance, the weak
point in the enemy's front, by piercing which the field was ultimately
won.[102] Nevertheless, he had been praised; and praise, at that period,
was his best reward. With a light heart and high hopes he started for
Paris, in further pursuit of fortune. In company with his patron, M. de
Modène, he presented himself at court. The sentinel on duty curiously
eyed their uniforms, and refused to admit them. The King, fatigued with
war's alarms, and anxious to banish from court all memories of carnage
and confusion, had ordered that no military dresses should appear in his
_salons_. In vain the young soldiers represented that they had parted
with all their possessions to serve their monarch, and that they had
surrendered the last means of otherwise arraying themselves; in vain
they insisted that the noblest decorations in the eyes of his Majesty
should be the dust and blood of the field of Fontenoy. They were
repulsed. De Modène revenged himself by the famous epigram which caused
an order of arrest, and compelled his flight. De Montalvan, taking the
insult more to heart, swore furiously that, excepting as a soldier and
in soldier's dress, he would never enter the French court, and from that
time had steadfastly persisted in the rigorous costume which excited M.
de Berniers's criticism. There were, indeed, some who declared that he
claimed as a virtue of obstinacy that which was only a necessity of
poverty; but for such aspersions he cared little.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account