The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 20, No. 122, December, 1867: A Magazine of Literature, Science, Art, and PoliticsVarious
General
The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 20, No. 122, December, 1867: A Magazine of Literature, Science, Art, and Politics
Various
American periodicals
We know that these varying conditions of light which affect us as color
have an absolute being. The photographer carries on his nice operations
behind a yellow screen undisturbed, when the substitution of a pink one
would at once allow of the chemical action of the other rays of light on
his plate, to the destruction of his image. Still, the pink and the
yellow, as colors, are brain sensations. We feel them with our eyes, and
the feeling they awaken we call color. The optic nerve receives the
undulations of ether thrown back from grass, and the peculiar sensation
thus awakened by their touch is called green. The color is not a part of
the grass, not a quantitative constituent, like its carbon or silex. The
grass has no color, because color is something existent in the eye of
the beholder, not in the object awakening that something by its peculiar
mode of reflecting light. A looking-glass does not possess, as a
constituent part, the image of a human face; but that face, when put
before it, appears to be a part of the glass; and if no looking-glass
had ever existed except with a certain face before it, that face would
be just as much a part of the glass as the color green is of grass. They
both reflect. Some people are color-blind. They cannot perceive any
difference between the rose and the leaves around it. Color is
inconceivable to them. Let us suppose, then, that all men were
color-blind. They would be fully cognizant of light, shadow, darkness;
but the nicer sensations of the brain which we call colors would be
utterly unknown to senses unable to feel their delicate touch. At the
same time, the different undulations of the different colors might have
been detected by other means than the sense of sight, as unseen gases
have been discovered by the chemist. And we cannot say that Nature may
not possess an inconceivable variety of influences inappreciable by our
senses. We say grass is green; but is it always so? What varying colors
does it possess under the varying light to which it is exposed. The same
grass is light green in the sun, dark green in the shadow, almost black
in the twilight, and at night what color is it? We may say that it is
green, but that we cannot see it. By no means. If greenness were an
inherent attribute, it would be persistent. The weight, density,
chemical construction, and size of the plant do not change from midday
to midnight. They are identical in the dark and the light. But the color
depends entirely on the character of light poured upon it; as that color
is only a peculiar reflection of that light, or part of it, and that
reflection is only green when it stimulates an optic nerve to a
sensation peculiar to its touch. The same grass becomes yellow or brown
in autumn, possessing then new powers of absorption and reflection. The
very limited capacity of the eye to receive sensation from light rays is
proved by the discovery that the spectrum possesses other rays, called
heat-rays, which the eye cannot perceive.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account