The atom and the Bohr theory of its structure : $b an elementary presentationHolst, Helge
Science
The atom and the Bohr theory of its structure : $b an elementary presentation
Holst, Helge
Atomic theory
The answer to the question is easiest in the case of the helium atom.
For when this is expelled as an α-particle, it carries, as Rutherford
was able to show, a positive charge of two units—in other words, two
electrons are necessary to change the positive ion into a neutral
atom. At the same time there is every reason to suppose that the
α-particle is simply a helium nucleus deprived of its electrons; it
follows, therefore, that the electron system of the neutral helium atom
consists of two electrons. Since the atomic weight of helium is four,
the number of electrons is consequently one-half the atomic weight.
Rutherford’s investigation of the deflections of α-particles in passing
through various media had already led him to believe that for many
other elements, to a considerable approximation, the nuclear charge
and hence the number of electrons was equal to half the atomic weight.
Hydrogen, of course, must form an exception, since its atomic weight is
unity. _The positive charge on the hydrogen nucleus is one elementary
quantum, and in the neutral state of the atom, only one electron
rotates about it._ Fig. 23 gives a representation of the structure
of the hydrogen atom, and the structures of the two types of hydrogen
ions formed respectively by the loss and gain of an electron. In the
picture, the position of the electron is, of course, arbitrary, and for
the sake of simplicity its path is supposed to be circular.
[Illustration: FIG. 23.—Schematic representation of the nuclear atom.
A, a neutral hydrogen atom; B, a positive, and C, a negative hydrogen
ion; _K_, atomic nuclei; _E_, electrons.]
As has just been indicated, Rutherford’s rule for the number of
electrons is only an approximation. A Dutch physicist, van den Broek,
conceived in the meantime the idea that the number of electrons in
the atom of an element is equal to its order number in the periodic
table (its “atomic number,” as it is now called). Especially through
a systematic investigation of the X-ray spectra characteristic of the
different elements this has proved to be the correct rule. In fact,
using Bragg’s reflection method of X-rays from crystal surfaces (cf. p.
54), the Englishman, Moseley, made in 1914 the far-reaching discovery
that these spectra possess an exceptionally simple structure, which
made it possible in a simple way to attach an order number to each
element (given on p. 23). On the basis of Bohr’s theory, established a
year before, it could be directly proved that this order number must be
identical with the number of positive elementary charges on the nucleus.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account