The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at AthensHaigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
History
The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at Athens
Haigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Greek drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- Greece -- Athens -- History -- To 500
The last change of which we have any trace or record was that effected by
Phaedrus about two centuries later. The stage was then lowered several
inches, and the front-wall erected in its present position. Half of it
still remains, together with a flight of steps leading down from stage
to orchestra. Such steps were common in Roman theatres, and had no doubt
existed previously in the Neronian theatre. The bas-relief, which had
formerly been a continuous one, was cut into sections, and arranged with
recesses at intervals, the recesses being filled with stone figures. One
of these—a kneeling Silenus—has been preserved. As to the purpose of
this reconstruction by Phaedrus there is much uncertainty. But Dörpfeld
conjectures that it may have been due, partly to the ruinous condition
of the old Neronian stage, partly to a desire to make the orchestra
water-tight for the purpose of holding mimic sea-fights in the manner
already described.[390]
§ 7. _The Earlier Stage-buildings._
We have now described the various traces of stage-buildings in the
Athenian theatre down to the time of Phaedrus. It remains to consider
the subject from a more general point of view, and to supplement and
illustrate the previous narrative by evidence derived from other
sources. The first and most interesting question concerns the structure
of the stage-buildings during the great period of the Attic drama from
Aeschylus to Aristophanes. On this point the existing remains throw very
little light. Still there are a few general conclusions which seem to
be fairly well established. It is evident, in the first place, that the
stage-buildings from the fifth down to the middle of the fourth century,
if Dörpfeld’s dates are adopted—those of the greater part of the fifth
century, according to Puchstein—must have been made of wood, and not of
stone. If they had been made of stone, it is difficult to believe that
they would have left no traces behind them. As regards their shape, they
probably resembled in general outline the earliest stone structure,
and consisted of an oblong building with projecting side-wings. These
side-wings were called ‘paraskenia’, because they lay on each side of the
‘skene’ or stage, and are actually mentioned by Demosthenes in his speech
against Meidias as forming a part of the theatre at that time.[391] But
though the stage-buildings of the fifth century were constructed of wood
only, they must have been firm and substantial erections, and at least
two stories in height. The use of such contrivances as the ‘mechane’ and
the ‘theologeion’, by which gods were exhibited high up in air, would
require buildings of not less than two stories, and of considerable
solidity. Hence we may also conclude that they were permanent structures,
and that they were not put up and taken down at each festival. No doubt,
in the course of a century and a half, they were often renewed, and often
changed and modified in detail, as experience suggested. During the first
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account