The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at AthensHaigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
History
The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at Athens
Haigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Greek drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- Greece -- Athens -- History -- To 500
The next point to be considered is the number of the entrances which
had to be provided when the scenery was erected, and the stage was made
ready for a dramatic performance. Pollux and Vitruvius, in speaking
of the scenery and stage decorations, agree in saying that there were
three doors at the back of the stage.[592] But this statement is much
too universal. In the majority of cases, no doubt, there were three such
doors. When the scene represented a palace, or temple, or dwelling-house,
three doors appear to have been always used. But when the scene was of
an exceptional character, the number of the entrances from the back of
the stage would vary according to the requirements of the play. For
instance, in the Philoctetes there would only be a single entrance, that
from the cavern. In the first part of the Ajax the only entrance would
be that leading out of the tent; in the second part there would be no
entrance at all, the background consisting merely of a solitary region
by the sea-shore. In the Cyclops, the only opening at the back of the
stage was the mouth of Polyphemus’ cave. In such plays as the Prometheus
of Aeschylus, and the Andromeda of Euripides, the background consisted
of rocks and cliffs, and there was no entrance from that quarter. It is
clear, therefore, that the statement that a Greek scene was provided with
three doors or entrances at the back is not universally true, but only
applies to the majority of cases.
Some details concerning the character of the three doors may be gathered
from the statements in Pollux and Vitruvius.[593] When the scene was
a palace, the central door was decorated with regal grandeur. The
side-doors were supposed to lead to the guest-chambers. Occasionally
one of the side-doors led to a guest-chamber, the other to a slaves’
prison. In comedy, the character and arrangement of the doors would vary
considerably, according as the scene was laid in front of one, or two, or
three dwelling-houses. In the last case, of which an example is supplied
by the Acharnians, there would be one door for each of the three houses.
Sometimes one of the side-doors represented the way into an outhouse,
or workshop, or stable. Sometimes it led into a temple, as in the
Thesmophoriazusae. In comedy, no doubt, there was much greater diversity
as to scenic details than in tragedy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account