The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at AthensHaigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
History
The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at Athens
Haigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Greek drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- Greece -- Athens -- History -- To 500
Three at least out of his seven extant plays are written for performance
by two actors only.[674] This limitation upon the number of the
performers necessitated great simplicity in the construction of the play,
since it was impossible for more than two personages to take part in the
dialogue at the same time. Hence the earlier plays of Aeschylus, though
essentially dramatic in comparison with anything which preceded them, are
simple in plot and lyrical in tone when compared with the tragedies of
his successors. The different scenes rather serve to unfold a series of
pictures than to develop a complicated plot. Descriptive speeches take
the place of animated dialogue. Sophocles added greatly to the capacities
of the drama by introducing a third actor.[675] He was thus enabled to
give much greater variety and spirit to the dialogue. In his hands
for the first time tragedy became completely dramatic, and the lyrical
element was thrust still further into the background. The innovation of
Sophocles was adopted by Aeschylus in his later years, and the Orestean
trilogy—the last and most elaborate of his works—requires three actors.
Under Sophocles tragedy received its full development. The number of
actors in tragedy was henceforward limited to three.
The satyric drama was intimately connected with tragedy, and the number
of actors was apparently the same. Thus the Cyclops of Euripides,
the only extant satyric play, requires three actors. In the Naples
vase-painting, which represents the performers in a satyric play, three
actors are depicted.[676] It is true that the Alcestis of Euripides,
which was performed in place of the usual satyric drama, only requires
two actors. But the number in this case was probably due to the choice of
the poet, and not to any official regulation. In regard to comedy, very
little is known as to the steps by which it was developed. The source of
comedy lay in the phallic songs performed at the festivals of Dionysus.
The dramatic element originated in the interludes by the leader of the
chorus. The process of development must have been much the same as in
tragedy; but the names of the persons who introduced actors and dialogue
into comedy were forgotten even in Aristotle’s time. The only piece of
information upon the subject is to the effect that Cratinus was the first
to limit the number of actors to three, and that before his time there
was no regulation as to the number of persons introduced upon the stage.
After the time of Cratinus there were no further innovations, and the
number of the actors in comedy was permanently fixed at three.[677]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account