The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at AthensHaigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
History
The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at Athens
Haigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Greek drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- Greece -- Athens -- History -- To 500
In the distribution of parts the protagonist took the principal
character. The parts of Oedipus, Electra, and Antigone, in the plays
of the same name by Sophocles, are specially mentioned as having been
acted by celebrated protagonists. Orestes in the play of Euripides is
also described as the part of the protagonist.[700] Usually, as in the
above instances, the chief personage gave the name to the piece. But
this was not always the case. In the Oenomaus of Sophocles the part of
Oenomaus was played by the tritagonist Aeschines. In the Cresphontes of
Euripides the principal character was Merope, and was taken by Theodorus.
The part of Cresphontes fell to Aeschines as tritagonist.[701] In the
Agamemnon of Aeschylus most likely the protagonist played the part of
Clytaemnestra, as this is certainly the most impressive character in the
play, though not the one with which the spectators are in sympathy. The
protagonist had also to take his share of the subordinate characters when
he could be spared. It has already been mentioned that in the Phoenissae
of Euripides the protagonist appeared in the part of Antigone as well
as in that of Jocasta. At times he took even the smallest characters
if the necessities of the play demanded it. Plutarch states that the
protagonist, in the part of a messenger or an attendant, often gained
more applause than the actor who bore the sceptre and the crown.[702]
It was, in fact, the chief advantage of the Greek system that even the
subordinate characters were played with as much excellence as the more
important ones. The tritagonist took what in modern times would be
called the ‘heavy’ parts. It was his special privilege, as Demosthenes
remarks, to play the tyrant and the sceptred monarch.[703] Aeschines,
in his career as tritagonist, often had to act gloomy tyrants of this
kind, such as Creon, Cresphontes, and Oenomaus. Such characters did not
require great powers in the actor. There was no pathos to be excited, no
play of conflicting emotions to be exhibited. All that was necessary was
a powerful voice, and a capacity for declaiming verses. Most likely for
the same reason the tritagonist usually spoke the prologues, which also
did not require much more in the actor than good powers of elocution.
Thus the ghost of Polydorus, which speaks the prologue in the Hecuba of
Euripides, was acted by Aeschines as tritagonist.[704] The deuteragonist
took the parts which, in point of interest, were intermediate between the
leading characters and the heavy parts which fell to the tritagonist.
There are not, however, any traditions as to particular characters having
been played by the deuteragonist. Attempts have been made in modern times
to assign the characters in the extant Greek dramas to the protagonist,
deuteragonist, and tritagonist respectively.[705] Such speculations are
interesting, in so far as they show that all the existing plays could be
perfectly well performed by three actors. Otherwise they are not of very
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account