The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at AthensHaigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
History
The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at Athens
Haigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Greek drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- Greece -- Athens -- History -- To 500
musicians very little is known. In works of art they never appear in
masks. But in the Birds it is clear that the flute-player and the four
harpists were disguised as birds, and wore masks of an appropriate kind.
Possibly in the Old Comedy the musicians were often arrayed in the same
fashion as the chorus. But in tragedy and satyric drama the evidence of
the vase-paintings would seem to show that they had no masks, but were
dressed either in ordinary costume or in the long and ornamental tunic of
the actors.[802] Their position during the performance was naturally in
the orchestra, close to the chorus. In the Birds Procne has to come down
from the stage to the orchestra, in order to accompany the parabasis. We
are told also that at the end of a drama the flute-player marched out
at the head of the chorus.[803] Hence we may conclude that he entered
in front of them at the beginning of a play; and this supposition is
confirmed by the manner in which the four harpists make their entrance in
the Birds. Very probably the usual place for the musicians was near the
altar of Dionysus.
§ 8. _Importance of the Voice in Greek Acting._
In ancient acting the possession of a fine musical voice was a matter
of absolute necessity. Several considerations will make it evident that
the voice of the actor, upon the Greek stage, must have been far more
important than it is at present. In the first place a considerable
portion of the words in every Greek play was either sung or delivered
in recitative. In the second place each actor had to play several parts
in succession, and to appear sometimes as a man, and sometimes as a
woman. It would be essential, therefore, to mark the difference between
the various personages by a corresponding variety in the tone of voice
employed; and for this purpose an organ of great flexibility and compass
must have been required. In the third place the whole character of
Greek acting was largely modified by the costume of the performers. A
modern actor adds force and emphasis to his speeches by means of the
variety of his facial expression. A single glance, a slight movement
of the features, is often enough to produce a very great effect. But
to the Greek actor this mode of impressing the spectators was denied,
owing to the use of masks. His features bore the same settled expression
throughout the play. Even his gestures, in the case of tragedy, must have
been much more restricted than in modern times, owing to the nature of
the dress which he had to wear. On account of these limitations he was
compelled to rely mainly upon his voice for the purpose of expressing
all the fleeting emotions of the character he represented. Great skill
and variety in the modulation of his tones were needed to counterbalance
the absence of facial movement. Lastly, the Greek actor required a voice
of enormous power, in order to make himself heard. When it is remembered
that the theatre of Dionysus was in the open air, and was capable of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account