The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at AthensHaigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
History
The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at Athens
Haigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Greek drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- Greece -- Athens -- History -- To 500
manner they gradually make their exit from the orchestra.[962]
The comic dance was called the ‘kordax’. Its movements were coarse and
lascivious, and its general style was suggestive of the phallic songs
out of which comedy had been developed. It was a dance for drunken
people, and no one but a man without any sense of shame would dance it
when he was sober. It was considered vulgar and disgraceful by Plato,
and excluded from his commonwealth.[963] Aristophanes, in the Clouds,
takes credit to himself for having abandoned it in that play; but, as
the scholiast remarks, he frequently introduces it elsewhere.[964] In
the comic dances the wildest movements were admissible. The chorus, at
the end of the Wasps, when encouraging the sons of Carcinus to fresh
exertions, bid them ‘whirl round like tops, and fling their legs up into
the sky’. Occasionally the circular dance of the dithyrambic chorus was
adopted in comedy.[965]
The dance used in the satyric drama was called the ‘sikinnis’. It was
mainly a parody and caricature of noble and graceful dances, and was
very violent and rapid in its movements. One of the postures used in the
satyric dance was called the owl, and is variously explained by the old
grammarians as having consisted in shading the eyes with the hands, or in
turning the head to and fro like an owl.[966]
§ 7. _The Music._
The music of a Greek play was simple in its character, and altogether
subordinate to the poetry. As Plutarch remarks, it was a sort of
seasoning or relish, the words being the main attraction.[967] Any
comparison therefore between a Greek play and a modern opera, as far as
the music is concerned, must be entirely illusive. In the first place
all Greek choral singing was in unison. The use of harmony in choral
compositions was apparently unknown to the Greeks. Even in modern times
Greek Church Music has retained the practice of chanting in unison.
Consequently the general style of the music in a Greek drama must
have been exceedingly simple and severe compared with the intricate
combinations of modern music. In the second place, the music was fitted
to the words, instead of the words being subordinated to the music. Each
note of the music corresponded, in most cases, to a separate syllable of
the verse, and the time of the music was determined entirely by the metre
of the verse. The ode was chanted in unison, syllable after syllable,
by the whole body of the choreutae. The modern practice of adapting the
words to the exigences of the music, and making different parts of the
chorus sing different words at the same time, was altogether unknown.
Hence it is probable that the words of a Greek chorus were heard with
considerable distinctness by the whole audience. When all the singing
was in unison, and the notes of the music corresponded to the syllables
of the verse, there was no reason why this should not be the case. In
modern choral singing the poetry is so far sacrificed to the music that
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account