The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at AthensHaigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
History
The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at Athens
Haigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Greek drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- Greece -- Athens -- History -- To 500
The Athenians were a lively audience, and gave expression to their
feelings in the most unmistakable manner. The noise and uproar produced
by an excited crowd of twenty thousand persons must have been of a
deafening character, and is described in the most uncomplimentary
language by Plato.[1057] It was exceedingly difficult for the judges to
resist such demonstrations, and to vote in accordance with their own
private judgement. The ordinary modes of signifying pleasure or disgust
were much the same in ancient as in modern times, and consisted of
hisses and groans on the one hand, and shouts and clapping of hands on
the other.[1058] The Athenians had also a peculiar way of marking their
disapproval of a performance by kicking with the heels of their sandals
against the front of the stone benches on which they were sitting.[1059]
Stones were occasionally thrown by an irate audience. Aeschines was
hissed off the stage, and ‘almost stoned to death’, in the course of his
theatrical career. There is an allusion to the practice in the story of
the second-rate musician, who borrowed a supply of stone from a friend
in order to build a house, and promised to repay him with the stones he
collected from his next performance in public.[1060] Country audiences in
the Attic demes used figs and olives, and similar missiles, for pelting
unpopular actors.[1061] On the other hand, encores were not unknown, if
particular passages took the fancy of the audience. Socrates is said to
have encored the first three lines of the Orestes of Euripides.[1062]
If the Athenians were dissatisfied with an actor or a play, they had
no hesitation about revealing the fact, but promptly put a stop to
the performance by means of hisses and groans and stamping with the
heels. They were able to do so with greater readiness, as several plays
were always performed in succession, and they could call for the next
play, without bringing the entertainment to a close. In this way they
sometimes got through the programme very rapidly. There is an instance
of such an occurrence in the story of the comic actor Hermon, whose play
should naturally have come on late in the day; but, as all the previous
performers were promptly hissed off the stage one after another, he was
called upon much sooner than he expected, and in consequence was not
ready to appear.[1063] If the tale about the comic poet Diphilus is true,
it would seem that even the authors of very unsuccessful plays were
sometimes forcibly ejected from the theatre.[1064]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account