The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at AthensHaigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
History
The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at Athens
Haigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Greek drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- Greece -- Athens -- History -- To 500
based on Thucydides, the presumption is that he understood his authority
and interpreted him correctly.’ Now in the present case it is admitted
that Pausanias had Thucydides before him; and when Thucydides speaks
of the ἀρχαιότερα Διονύσια as celebrated at the temple ἐν Λίμναις, and
when the pseudo-Demosthenes (l.c.), a connecting link, speaks of the
ἐν Λίμναις as the ἀρχαιότατον ἱερόν of Dionysus, it is infinitely more
natural to suppose that Pausanias also, speaking of the ἀρχαιότατον
ἱερόν, refers to the precinct ἐν Λίμναις, and that therefore the temple
ἐν Λίμναις was πρὸς τῷ θεάτρῳ, than with Wilamowitz (Hermes, xxi) to
construct a theory of clumsy mistakes on Pausanias’ part. Of course, for
the reasons given by Wilamowitz, the ἐν Λίμναις was not the same as the
theatre or temple of Dionysus Eleuthereus, but it may well have been
within the same ἱερόν, the same sacred precinct, or quite close to it, on
the SW. of the acropolis.
Now Miss Harrison (l.c., p. 83) writes that ‘Thucydides himself seems to
warn us. He seems to say, “not that precinct which you all know so well
and think so much of, not that theatre where year by year you all go,
but an earlier and more venerable place, and, that there be no mistake,
the place where you go on the 12th day of Anthesterion, &c.”’: and she
concludes that Pausanias was wrong in saying that the oldest sanctuary of
Dionysus was πρὸς τῷ θεάτρῳ. Thucydides, she seems to argue, would not
have been at such pains to distinguish the two ‘hiera’ if they had been
close to each other. But (if he is really intending to distinguish them)
this may just as well have been because they _were_ close to each other
and might be confused. However, so far as this passage goes, the theatre
may or may not have been near the oldest sanctuary; Thucydides would not
have any reason to think of the theatre _in either case_, for the simple
reason that it was not old enough to add anything to his argument, and
any mention of it would have been irrelevant and confusing.
The most natural conclusion then from the words of Thucydides and
Pausanias is that the temple ἐν Λίμναις was near the theatre, and not
in Dörpfeld’s precinct to the WNW. of the acropolis. (In spite of Miss
Harrison it seems that the other temples mentioned by Thucydides can be
accommodated with sites at least as well on the view here taken as on
that taken by Dörpfeld, and I should say very much better. See Bates
(Trans. Amer. Phil. Assoc, vol. 30); E. Gardner (l.c.); Farnell (Class.
Rev. 1900, &c.).)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account