The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at AthensHaigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
History
The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at Athens
Haigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Greek drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- Greece -- Athens -- History -- To 500
These contests were limited to the principal actors or protagonists in
each play. The subordinate actors, the deuteragonist and tritagonist,
had nothing to do with them. The principal actor in a Greek play was a
much more important personage than even the ‘star’ in a modern company.
The actors in a Greek play were limited to three in number, and each
of them had to play several parts in succession, by means of changes
in dress and mask. Hence the protagonist had to perform not only the
principal part, but also several of the subordinate ones. Besides this,
the composition of most Greek tragedies was designed with the express
purpose of bringing out into strong relief the character of the principal
personage. The incidents were intended to draw forth his different
emotions: the subordinate characters were so many foils to him. As a
consequence, the success of a Greek play depended almost wholly upon the
protagonist. In the ordinary language of the times he was said to ‘act
the play’, as if the other performers were of no importance. To take an
example from existing inscriptions, it is recorded that in 340 ‘Astydamas
was victorious with the Parthenopaeus, acted by Thessalus, and the
Lycaon, acted by Neoptolemus’.[170] This is the regular form of the old
records both in tragedy and comedy. Demosthenes uses similar language.
Referring to the Phoenix of Euripides, he says that ‘Theodorus and
Aristodemus never acted this play’. The form of the language is proof of
the overwhelming importance of the protagonist.[171] The only other point
to be noticed is that the success of the actor was quite independent of
the success of the play in which he was performing. Thus in one of the
comic contests of the second century the prize for acting was won by
Onesimus. But the play in which he acted, the Shipwrecked Mariner, only
won the second place. The successful comedy, the Ephesians, was acted by
Sophilus. Similarly in the tragic contests of the year 418 the prize for
acting was won by Callippides; but the poet Callistratus, whose three
tragedies he performed, was only second. The tragedies of the successful
poet were acted by Lysicrates.[172]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account