The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at AthensHaigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
History
The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at Athens
Haigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Greek drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- Greece -- Athens -- History -- To 500
In the course of recent excavations underneath the orchestra two
discoveries have been made. It appears that at some unknown period
certain tunnels of irregular shape, and too small to serve as passages,
were bored through the rock, but filled up again as soon as made. Also,
just in front of the Roman stage, the rock was cut away in a straight
line, and the cutting was continued as far as the stage-buildings, the
interval being filled up with earth. The purpose of both these works is
quite uncertain.[354]
It will be seen, from the above description, that the remains of the
Athenian theatre throw very little light upon the character of the
ancient orchestra. Fortunately, during the last ten or fifteen years, a
large number of other theatres have been excavated, which suffered less
from reconstruction, and in which the orchestras have been left more
or less in their original condition. The finest and best preserved of
these is the theatre of Epidaurus, which was built at the end of the
fourth century.[355] It is described by Pausanias as the most beautiful
theatre in the world.[356] A plan of the building (Fig. 6) is here
inserted, together with a view taken from the north-east (Fig. 7).[357]
The evidence derived from this and other theatres will enable us to clear
up many questions in connexion with the orchestra, to which the Athenian
theatre supplies no answer.
[Illustration: FIG. 6.]
In the early Greek theatres, as already pointed out, the seats of the
spectators were so arranged that every one had an excellent view of the
orchestra, while the view of the stage was in many cases a very poor one.
When the Romans gave up the orchestra to the spectators, and transferred
all the performances to the stage, they made various alterations in the
arrangement and proportions of the theatre. They largely diminished the
size of the orchestra by bringing the stage several yards forward; and at
the same time they cut off considerable portions from the two ends of the
auditorium. In this way they were enabled to make the stage much deeper,
so as to accommodate a larger number of performers. By shortening the
wings of the auditorium they abolished those seats which looked away from
the stage. Vitruvius gives some interesting directions for determining
the proper proportions of a Greek and Roman theatre.[358] According
to his figures the orchestra in a Roman theatre constituted an exact
semicircle. The front line of the stage coincided precisely with the
diameter of the orchestra. In a Greek theatre the stage was placed much
further back. The distance between the central point of the front line
of the stage and the central point in the opposite circumference of the
orchestra was six-sevenths of the diameter of the orchestra. In a Greek
theatre therefore, according to this statement, if the circumference of
the orchestra was prolonged so as to form a complete circle, it would
be found that the front line of the stage only intersected a very small
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account