‘You have titles enough of your own to pass your name to
posterity, and I am pleased that you have got spirit enough to
hope that there will be such a thing as a civilised posterity to
attend to things of this kind.
‘I have the honour to be,
‘With very high respect and esteem,
‘Your most obedient, humble servant,
‘EDMUND BURKE.’
Mr. Burke died July 7 [_note by A. Y._].
From John Symonds, Esq., on public affairs, very gloomy, with much
condemnation of Mr. Pitt.
‘St. Edmund’s Hill: June 8, 1797.
‘At the time, my dear sir, that I received your letter I was
travelling over Italy, in order to figure in your “Annals of
Agriculture;” but the state of that country has been so much
_bouleversé_, that my head has been turned in reflecting upon it,
as is most probably the case with the greater part of its
inhabitants.
‘You ask me what plan I could propose to save the country. Arm,
undoubtedly, as you say; but how to do it most effectually I
pretend not to determine. You justly reprobate volunteering
infantry.
‘Charles Cole tells me you have something in the press upon this
subject. To fill the army or navy with defenders or volunteers, is
the way to pave the way to our ruin. But I should begin with
proposing a scheme which would probably be heard with disdain, and
which has been rejected by the King: recall Lord Camden; appoint
Lord Moira, Lord Lieutenant, with full powers to emancipate the
Roman Catholics. He is much respected in Ireland as well as in
England, for the opinion formed of him from his civil and military
knowledge and moral character. I have heard Lord Bishop Douglas,
who is no mean estimator of mankind, often say, that he wished he
could see Lord Moira one of the Secretaries of State.
‘Were the Catholics satisfied, Ireland might bid defiance to the
French, and, perhaps, some regular infantry might thence be sent
to England, which, the Duke of Grafton said lately in the House of
Lords, was much wanted here. But it is in vain to speak or write
about Ireland.
We govern there by a faction—the Beresfords, Fitzgibbons, and
Fosters—whose emoluments, including their relations and
dependents, fall not short of 100,000_l._ per annum; some think
much more. Now the Polignacs under the old government had not more
than 50,000_l._ per annum, including a bishopric. This the Duchess
of Liancourt one day made out to me upon paper, yet she was
willing enough to exaggerate the profits of that family;
especially as the old duchess just before had been cast in a
lawsuit with one of them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account