London very disagreeable to me, and has made me compare in my mind
my present situation with a large income, and that of living in a
cottage in the country upon 100_l._ a year, without trouble or
anxiety or business, except to make my peace with God. I liked my
time alone with my old woman [servant] at Bradfield much better than
here. I had nobody to wrangle and quarrel with me.
_May 4._—Yesterday I was at church in the morning with Mrs. O. Oakes
at the Lock, and heard Scott, and in the evening at the Surrey
Chapel to hear Rowland Hill. Neither of them pleased, though she
admits Scott’s matter was excellent. She was most struck with the
extreme fervency of Mr. Wilberforce’s devotion, who, sitting in the
reading desk for the convenience of hearing better, she saw him
clearly. Bought Rowland Hill’s sermon on the Sunday Schools against
the attack of Bishop Horsley,[204] who is, from all I hear of him,
such a bishop as Suffolk parsons are clergymen. Scott thinks that
evil spirits do work on our souls, and to me it is remarkable that
he says the imagination is their great field. I have reason enough
to believe him in the right. These are enquiries in which we have no
other clue to guide us but Scripture, and surely there we find
proofs without end of the agency of evil spirits; for my own part I
have no doubt of it.
_Bradfield._—As there was no church this morning, I had eleven poor
women from the village to talk to upon their neglect of church. I
read many passages on public worship and prayer out of Dodd’s
Commentary on the Bible, and explained, preached, and reasoned with
them. One made a defence, and was inclined to prate. I took it
coolly, and presently brought her to better reason. I doubt they
liked a sixpence apiece better than my sermon, yet three of them
cried. How much more docile and teachable are the poor than the
rich! One might gradually do much with the poor, but very little
indeed with their betters. God opens the hearts of the one, and
hardens those of the others as a punishment for their pride and
ingratitude.
The Duke of Bedford has asked Lord Carrington to the sheep shearing.
Lord Egremont called, he remarks that the Chancellor, Lord Rosslyn,
and Lord Grenville, &c. &c., all have in the late debates gone out
of the way to abuse the Board of Agriculture, and remarks that
keeping a Board only to treat it in this manner is preposterous.
_7th._—My publications are very well adapted to take off the edge of
all worldly infatuated admiration or dependence on the things of
time in comparison of those of eternity. Washington’s Letters have
been advertised to the expense of 5_l._ or 6_l._, and I do not
believe that 100 are sold, and my enquiry into the cottage system
for poor people will have no more effect on Government or the
Legislature than if I had whistled ‘Alley Croker.’ So much the
better perhaps for the good of my soul.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account