—There is another unfortunate way of looking, which is peculiar to that
amiable sex we do not like to find fault with. There are some very
pretty, but, unhappily, very ill-bred women, who don’t understand the law
of the road with regard to handsome faces. Nature and custom would, no
doubt, agree in conceding to all males the right of at least two distinct
looks at every comely female countenance, without any infraction of the
rules of courtesy or the sentiment of respect. The first look is
necessary to define the person of the individual one meets so as to avoid
it in passing. Any unusual attraction detected in a first glance is a
sufficient apology for a second,—not a prolonged and impertinent stare,
but an appreciating homage of the eyes, such as a stranger may
inoffensively yield to a passing image. It is astonishing how morbidly
sensitive some vulgar beauties are to the slightest demonstration of this
kind. When a lady walks the streets, she leaves her virtuous-indignation
countenance at home; she knows well enough that the street is a
picture-gallery, where pretty faces framed in pretty bonnets are meant to
be seen, and everybody has a right to see them.
—When we observe how the same features and style of person and character
descend from generation to generation, we can believe that some inherited
weakness may account for these peculiarities. Little snapping-turtles
snap—so the great naturalist tells us—before they are out of the
egg-shell. I am satisfied, that, much higher up in the scale of life,
character is distinctly shown at the age of -2 or -3 months.
—My friend, the Professor, has been full of eggs lately. [This remark
excited a burst of hilarity which I did not allow to interrupt the course
of my observations.] He has been reading the great book where he found
the fact about the little snapping-turtles mentioned above. Some of the
things he has told me have suggested several odd analogies enough.
There are half a dozen men, or so, who carry in their brains the _ovarian
eggs_ of the next generation’s or century’s civilization. These eggs are
not ready to be laid in the form of books as yet; some of them are hardly
ready to be put into the form of talk. But as rudimentary ideas or
inchoate tendencies, there they are; and these are what must form the
future. A man’s general notions are not good for much, unless he has a
crop of these intellectual ovarian eggs in his own brain, or knows them
as they exist in the minds of others. One must be in the _habit_ of
talking with such persons to get at these rudimentary germs of thought;
for their development is necessarily imperfect, and they are moulded on
new patterns, which must be long and closely studied. But these are the
men to talk with. No fresh truth ever gets into a book.
—A good many fresh lies get in, anyhow,—said one of the company.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account