What shall I do about it? Tell him the whole truth, and send him a
ticket of admission to the Institution for Idiots and Feeble-minded
Youth? One doesn’t like to be cruel,—and yet one hates to lie.
Therefore one softens down the ugly central fact of donkeyism,—recommends
study of good models,—that writing verse should be an incidental
occupation only, not interfering with the hoe, the needle, the lapstone,
or the ledger,—and, above all that there should be no hurry in printing
what is written. Not the least use in all this. The poetaster who has
tasted type is done for. He is like the man who has once been a
candidate for the Presidency. He feeds on the madder of his delusion all
his days, and his very bones grow red with the glow of his foolish fancy.
One of these young brains is like a bunch of India crackers; once touch
fire to it and it is best to keep hands off until it has done popping,—if
it ever stops. I have two letters on file; one is a pattern of
adulation, the other of impertinence. My reply to the first, containing
the best advice I could give, conveyed in courteous language, had brought
out the second. There was some sport in this, but Dulness is not
commonly a game fish, and only sulks after he is struck. You may set it
down as a truth which admits of few exceptions, that those who ask your
_opinion_ really want your _praise_, and will be contented with nothing
less.
There is another kind of application to which editors, or those supposed
to have access to them, are liable, and which often proves trying and
painful. One is appealed to in behalf of some person in needy
circumstances who wishes to make a living by the pen. A manuscript
accompanying the letter is offered for publication. It is not commonly
brilliant, too often lamentably deficient. If Rachel’s saying is true,
that “fortune is the measure of intelligence,” then poverty is evidence
of limited capacity which it too frequently proves to be, notwithstanding
a noble exception here and there. Now an editor is a person under a
contract with the public to furnish them with the best things he can
afford for his money. Charity shown by the publication of an inferior
article would be like the generosity of Claude Duval and the other
gentlemen highwaymen, who pitied the poor so much they robbed the rich to
have the means of relieving them.
Though I am not and never was an editor, I know something of the trials
to which they are submitted. They have nothing to do but to develope
enormous calluses at every point of contact with authorship. Their
business is not a matter of sympathy, but of intellect. They must reject
the unfit productions of those whom they long to befriend, because it
would be a profligate charity to accept them. One cannot burn his house
down to warm the hands even of the fatherless and the widow.
THE PROFESSOR UNDER CHLOROFORM.
—You haven’t heard about my friend the Professor’s first experiment in
the use of anæsthetics, have you?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account