The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
The movement was thus successfully localised on the European continent,
and further afield it was still more easily cut short. After the
withdrawal of the Turkish squadron, the Greek fleet had to look on at
the systematic destruction of Kydhonies,[1] a flourishing Greek
industrial town on the mainland opposite Mitylini which had been
founded under the sultan’s auspices only forty years before. All that
the islanders could do was to take off the survivors in their boats;
and when they dispersed to their ports in autumn, the Ottoman ships
came out again from the Dardanelles, sailed round Peloponnesos into the
Korinthian Gulf, and destroyed Galaxídhi. A still greater catastrophe
followed the reopening of naval operations next spring. In March 1822
the Samians landed a force on Khios and besieged the Turkish garrison,
which was relieved after three weeks by the arrival of the Ottoman
fleet. A month later the Greek fleet likewise appeared on the scene,
and on June 18 a Psariot captain, Constantine Kanaris, actually
destroyed the Ottoman flag-ship by a daring fire-ship attack. Upon this
the Ottoman fleet fled back as usual to the Dardanelles; yet the only
consequence was the complete devastation, in revenge, of helpless
Khios. The long-shielded prosperity of the island was remorselessly
destroyed, the people were either enslaved or massacred, and the
victorious fleet had to stand by as passively this time as at the
destruction of Kydhonies the season before. In the following summer,
again, the same fate befell Trikéri, a maritime community on the Gulf
of Volo which had gained its freedom when the rest of Thessaly stirred
in vain; and so in 1823 the revolution found itself confined on sea, as
well as on land, to the focus where it had originated in April 1821.
[Footnote 1: Turkish Aivali.]
This isolation was a practical triumph for Sultan Mahmud. The
maintenance of the Ottoman Empire on the basis of Moslem ascendancy was
thereby assured; but it remained to be seen whether the isolated area
could now be restored to the _status quo_ in which the rest of his
dominions had been retained.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account