The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
For the Epirot boy the school is the door to the future. The language
he learns there makes him the member of a nation, and opens to him a
world wide enough to employ all the talent and energy he may possess,
if he seeks his fortune at Patras or Peiraeus, or in the great Greek
commercial communities of Alexandria and Constantinople; while, if he
stays at home, it still affords him a link with the life of civilized
Europe through the medium of the ubiquitous Greek newspaper.[1] The
Epirot has thus become Greek in soul, for he has reached the conception
of a national life more liberal than the isolated existence of his
native village through the avenue of Greek culture. ‘Hellenism’ and
nationality have become for him identical ideas; and when at last the
hour of deliverance struck, he welcomed the Greek armies that marched
into his country from the south and the east, after the fall of Yannina
in the spring of 1913, with the same enthusiasm with which all the
enslaved populations of native Greek dialect greeted the consummation
of a century’s hopes.
[Footnote 1: There is still practically no literature printed in the
Albanian language.]
The Greek troops arrived only just in time, for the ‘Hellenism’ of the
Epirots had been terribly proved by murderous attacks from their Moslem
neighbours on the north. The latter speak a variety of the same
Albanian tongue, but were differentiated by a creed which assimilated
them to the ruling race. They had been superior to their Christian
kinsmen by the weight of numbers and the possession of arms, which
under the Ottoman régime were the monopoly of the Moslem. At last,
however, the yoke of oppression was broken and the Greek occupation
seemed a harbinger of security for the future. Unluckily, however,
Epirus was of interest to others besides its own inhabitants. It
occupies an important geographical position facing the extreme heel of
Italy, just below the narrowest point in the neck of the Adriatic, and
the Italian Government insisted that the country should be included in
the newly erected principality of Albania, which the powers had
reserved the right to delimit in concert by a provision in the Treaty
of London.
Italy gave two reasons for her demand. First, she declared it
incompatible with her own vital interests that both shores of the
strait between Corfù and the mainland should pass into the hands of the
same power, because the combination of both coasts and the channel
between them offered a site for a naval base that might dominate the
mouth of the Adriatic. Secondly, she maintained that the native
Albanian speech of the Epirots proved their Albanian nationality, and
that it was unjust to the new Albanian state to exclude from it the
most prosperous and civilized branch of the Albanian nation. Neither
argument is cogent.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account