The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
The northern territories acquired in 1913 will give a much greater
impetus to economic progress than Thessaly gave a generation ago; for
the Macedonian littoral west as well as east of the Struma produces a
considerable proportion of the Turkish Régie tobacco, while the
pine-forests of Pindus, if judiciously exploited, will go far to remedy
the present deficiency of home-grown timber, even if they do not
provide quantities sufficient for export abroad. If we take into
account the currant-crop of the Peloponnesian plain-lands which already
almost monopolizes the world-market, the rare ores of the south-eastern
mountains and the Archipelago, and the vintages which scientific
treatment might bring into competition with the wines of the Peninsula
and France, we can see that Greece has many sources of material
prosperity within her reach, if only she applies her liberated energy
to their development. Yet these are all of them specialized products,
and Greece will never export any staple commodity to rival the grain
which Rumania sends in such quantities to central Europe already, and
which Bulgaria will begin to send within a few years’ time. Even the
consolidated Greek kingdom will be too small in area and too little
compact in geographical outline to constitute an independent economic
unit, and the ultimate economic interests of the country demand
co-operation in some organization more comprehensive than the political
molecule of the national state.
Such an association should embrace the Balkans in their widest extent—
from the Black Sea to the Adriatic and from the Carpathians to the
Aegean; for, in sharp contrast to the inextricable chaos of its
linguistic and ecclesiastical divisions, the region constitutes
economically a homogeneous and indivisible whole, in which none of the
parts can divest themselves of their mutual interdependence. Greece,
for example, has secured at last her direct link with the railway
system of the European continent, but for free transit beyond her own
frontier she still depends on Serbia’s good-will, just, as Serbia
depends on hers for an outlet to the Aegean at Salonika. The two states
have provided for their respective interests by a joint proprietorship
of the section of railway between Salonika and Belgrade; and similar
railway problems will doubtless bring Rumania to terms with Serbia for
access to the Adriatic, and both with Bulgaria for rights of way to
Constantinople and the Anatolian hinterland beyond. These common
commercial arteries of the Balkans take no account of racial or
political frontiers, but link the region as a whole with other regions
in a common economic relation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account