The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
In 1821 the Greek revolution, striving to create an independent Greece,
broke out on Rumanian ground, supported by the princes of Moldavia and
Muntenia. Of this support the Rumanians strongly disapproved, for, if
successful, the movement would have strengthened the obnoxious Greek
domination; If unsuccessful, the Turks were sure to take a terrible
revenge for the assistance given by the Rumanian countries. The
movement, which was started about the same time by the ennobled
peasant, Tudor Vladimirescu, for the emancipation of the lower classes,
soon acquired, therefore, an anti-Greek tendency. Vladimirescu was
assassinated at the instigation of the Greeks; the latter were
completely checked by the Turks, who, grown suspicious after the Greek
rising and confronted with the energetic attitude of the Rumanian
nobility, consented in 1822 to the nomination of two native boyards,
Jonitza Sturdza and Gregory Ghica, recommended by their countrymen, as
princes of Moldavia and Wallachia. The iniquitous system of ‘the throne
to the highest bidder’ had come to an end.
The period which marks the decline of Greek influence in the Rumanian
principalities also marks the growth of Russian influence; the first
meant economic exploitation, the second was a serious menace to the
very existence of the Rumanian nation. But if Russia seemed a possible
future danger, Turkey with its Phanariote following was a certain and
immediate menace. When, therefore, at the outbreak of the conflict with
Turkey in 1828 the Russians once more passed the Pruth, the country
welcomed them. Indeed, the Rumanian boyards, who after the rising of
1821 and the Turkish occupation had taken refuge in Transylvania, had
even more than once invited Russian intervention.[1] Hopes and fears
alike were realized. By the Treaty of Adrianople (1829) the rights of
Turkey as suzerain were limited to the exaction of a monetary tribute
and the right of investiture of the princes, one important innovation
being that these last were to be elected by national assemblies for
life. But, on the other hand, a Russian protectorate was established,
and the provinces remained in Russian military occupation up to 1834,
pending the payment of the war indemnity by Turkey. The ultimate aim of
Russia may be open to discussion. Her immediate aim was to make Russian
influence paramount in the principalities; this being the only possible
explanation of the anomalous fact that, pending the payment of the war
indemnity, Russia herself was occupying the provinces whose autonomy
she had but now forcibly retrieved from Turkey. The _Règlement
Organique_, the new constitutional law given to the principalities by
their Russian governor, Count Kisseleff, truly reflected the tendency.
From the administrative point of view it was meant to make for
progress; from the political point of view it was meant to bind the two
principalities to the will of the Tsar. The personal charm of Count
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account