The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
To understand the argument of the two powers concerned and the decision
to which it led, it must be borne in mind that the principalities were
in the occupation of an Austrian army, which had replaced the Russian
armies withdrawn in 1854, and that the elections for the assemblies
were to be presided over by Turkish commissaries. Indeed, the latter,
in collaboration with the Austrian consuls, so successfully doctored
the election lists,[1] that the idea of union might once more have
fallen through, had it not been for the invaluable assistance which
Napoleon III gave the Rumanian countries. As Turkish policy was relying
mainly on England’s support, Napoleon brought about a personal meeting
with Queen Victoria and Prince Albert, at Osborne (August 1857), the
result of which was a compromise: Napoleon agreed to defer for the time
being the idea of an effective union of the two principalities, England
undertaking, on the other hand, to make the Porte cancel the previous
elections, and proceed to new ones after revision of the electoral
lists. The corrupt Austrian and Turkish influence on the old elections
was best demonstrated by the fact that only three of the total of
eighty-four old members succeeded in securing re-election. The
assemblies met and proclaimed as imperatively necessary to the future
welfare of the provinces, their union, ‘for no frontier divides us, and
everything tends to bring us closer, and nothing to separate us, save
the ill-will of those who desire to see us disunited and weak’;
further, a foreign hereditary dynasty, because ‘the accession to the
throne of princes chosen from amongst us has been a constant pretext
for foreign interference, and the throne has been the cause of unending
feud among the great families of this country’. Moreover, if the union
of the two principalities was to be accomplished under a native prince,
it is obvious that the competition would have become doubly keen; not
to speak of the jealousies likely to be arousal between Moldavians and
Muntenians.
[Footnote 1: The edifying correspondence between the Porte and its
commissary Vorgoridès regarding the arrangements for the Rumanian
elections fell into the hands of Rumanian politicians, and caused a
great sensation when it appeared in _L’Etoile du Danube_, published in
Brussels by Rumanian _émigrés_.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account