The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
From the point of view of internal politics progress has been less
satisfactory. The various reforms once achieved, the differences of
principle between the political parties degenerated into mere
opportunism, the Opposition opposing, the Government disposing. The
parties, and especially the various groups within the parties, are
generally known by the names of their leaders, these denominations not
implying any definite political principle or Government programme. It
is, moreover, far from edifying that the personal element should so
frequently distort political discussion. ‘The introduction of modern
forms of state organization has not been followed by the
democratization of all social institutions…. The masses of the people
have remained all but completely outside political life. Not only are
we yet far from government of the people by the people, but our
liberties, though deeply graven on the facade of our constitution, have
not permeated everyday life nor even stirred in the consciousness of
the people.’[1]
[Footnote 1: C. Stere, _Social-democratizm sau Poporanizm_, Jassy.]
It is strange that King Carol, who had the welfare of the people
sincerely at heart, should not have used his influence to bring about a
solution of the rural question; but this may perhaps be explained by
the fact that, from Cuza’s experience, he anticipated opposition from
all political factions. It would almost seem as if, by a tacit
understanding, and anxious to establish Rumania’s international
position, King Carol gave his ministers a free hand in the rural
question, reserving for himself an equally free hand in foreign
affairs. This seems borne out by the fact that, in the four volumes in
which an ‘eyewitness’, making use of the king’s private correspondence
and personal notes, has minutely described the first fifteen years of
the reign, the peasant question is entirely ignored.[1]
[Footnote 1: The ‘eyewitness’ was Dr. Schaeffer, formerly tutor to
Prince Carol.]
Addressing himself, in 1871, to the Rumanian representative at the
Porte, the Austrian ambassador, von Prokesch-Osten, remarked: ‘If
Prince Carol manages to pull through without outside help, and make
Rumania governable, it will be the greatest _tour de force_ I have ever
witnessed in my diplomatic career of more than half a century. It will
be nothing less than a conjuring trick.’ King Carol succeeded; and only
those acquainted with Rumanian affairs can appreciate the truth of the
ambassador’s words.
7
_Contemporary Period: Foreign Affairs_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account