The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
ambitions, however, completely subverted this momentous step towards a
satisfactory solution of the Eastern Question.
[Footnote 1: Albert Sorel, op, cit., p. 266.]
The natural counter-effect of the diplomatic activity of the Central
Powers was a change in Rumanian policy. Rumania considered the
maintenance of the Balkan equilibrium a vital question, and as she had
entered upon a closer union with Germany against a Bulgaria subjected
to Russian influence, so she now turned to Russia as a guard against a
Bulgaria under German influence. This breaking away from the
‘traditional’ policy of adjutancy-in-waiting to the Central Powers was
indicated by the visit of Prince Ferdinand—now King of Rumania—to St.
Petersburg, and the even more significant visit which Tsar Nicholas
afterwards paid to the late King Carol at Constanza. Time has been too
short, however, for those new relations so to shape themselves as to
exercise a notable influence upon Rumania’s present attitude.
8
_Rumania and the Present War_
_(a) The Rumanians outside the Kingdom_
The axis on which Rumanian foreign policy ought naturally to revolve is
the circumstance that almost half the Rumanian nation lives outside
Rumanian territory. As the available official statistics generally show
political bias it is not possible to give precise figures; but roughly
speaking there are about one million Rumanians in Bessarabia, a quarter
of a million in Bucovina, three and a half millions in Hungary, while
something above half a million form scattered colonies in Bulgaria,
Serbia, and Macedonia. All these live in more or less close proximity
to the Rumanian frontiers.
That these Rumanian elements have maintained their nationality is due
to purely intrinsic causes. We have seen that the independence of
Rumania in her foreign relations had only recently been established,
since when the king, the factor most influential in foreign politics,
had discouraged nationalist tendencies, lest the country’s internal
development might be compromised by friction with neighbouring states.
The Government exerted its influence against any active expression of
the national feeling, and the few ‘nationalists’ and the ‘League for
the cultural unity of all Rumanians’ had been, as a consequence, driven
to seek a justification for their existence in antisemitic agitation.
The above circumstances had little influence upon the situation in
Bucovina. This province forms an integral part of the Habsburg
monarchy, with which it was incorporated as early as 1775. The
political situation of the Rumanian principalities at the time, and the
absence of a national cultural movement, left the detached population
exposed to Germanization, and later to the Slav influence of the
rapidly expanding Ruthene element. That language and national
characteristics have, nevertheless, not been lost is due to the fact
that the Rumanian population of Bucovina is peasant almost to a man—a
class little amenable to changes of civilization.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account