The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
I have sketched elsewhere the early history of the Rumanians of
Transylvania, the cradle of the Rumanian nation. As already mentioned,
part of the Rumanian nobility of Hungary went over to the Magyars, the
remainder migrating over the mountains. Debarred from the support of
the noble class, the Rumanian peasantry lost its state of autonomy,
which changed into one of serfdom to the soil upon which they toiled.
Desperate risings in 1324, 1437, 1514, 1600, and 1784 tended to case
the Hungarian oppression, which up to the nineteenth century strove
primarily after a political and religious hegemony. But the Magyars
having failed in 1848 in their attempt to free themselves from Austrian
domination (defeated with the assistance of a Russian army at Villagos,
1849), mainly on account of the fidelity of the other nationalities to
the Austrian Crown, they henceforth directed their efforts towards
strengthening their own position by forcible assimilation of those
nationalities. This they were able to do, however, only after
Königgrätz, when a weakened Austria had to give way to Hungarian
demands. In 1867 the Dual Monarchy was established, and Transylvania,
which up to then formed a separate duchy enjoying full political
rights, was incorporated with the new Hungarian kingdom. The Magyars
were handicapped in their imperialist ambitions by their numerical
inferiority. As the next best means to their end, therefore, they
resorted to political and national oppression, class despotism, and a
complete disregard of the principles of liberty and humanity.[1]
Hungarian was made compulsory in the administration, even in districts
where the bulk of the population did not understand that language. In
villages completely inhabited by Rumanians so-called ‘State’ schools
were founded, in which only Hungarian was to be spoken, and all
children upwards of three years of age had to attend them. The
electoral regulations were drawn up in such a manner that the Rumanians
of Transylvania, though ten times more numerous than the Magyars, sent
a far smaller number than do the latter to the National Assembly. To
quash all protest a special press law was introduced for Transylvania.
But the Rumanian journalists being usually acquitted by the juries a
new regulation prescribed that press offences should be tried only at
Kluj (Klausenburg)—the sole Transylvanian town with a predominating
Hungarian population—a measure which was in fundamental contradiction
to the principles of justice.[2] In 1892 the Rumanian grievances were
embodied in a memorandum which was to have been presented to the
emperor by a deputation. An audience was, however, refused, and at the
instance of the Hungarian Government the members of the deputation were
sentenced to long terms of imprisonment for having plotted against the
unity of the Magyar state.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account